ncing the examples section of man installboot(8))
>> |
>> | Can s.o. verifiy that instead of
>> | # installboot sd0
>> |
>> | it is equally safe to issue
>> | # installboot
>> | (the DUID itself, of course)?
>> |
>> | My system is fully encrypted
On Tuesday 04 July 2017 20:55:25 Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 08:34:56PM +0200, Stefan Wollny wrote:
> | Hi there!
> |
> | Sorry if this may sound like a rather stupid question:
> | (Referencing the examples section of man installboot(8))
> |
> | Can s.o.
On Tuesday 04 July 2017 20:34:56 Stefan Wollny wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> Sorry if this may sound like a rather stupid question:
> (Referencing the examples section of man installboot(8))
>
> Can s.o. verifiy that instead of
> # installboot sd0
>
> it is equally sa
Am 07/04/17 um 20:55 schrieb Paul de Weerd:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 08:34:56PM +0200, Stefan Wollny wrote:
> | Hi there!
> |
> | Sorry if this may sound like a rather stupid question:
> | (Referencing the examples section of man installboot(8))
> |
> | Can s.o. ver
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 08:34:56PM +0200, Stefan Wollny wrote:
| Hi there!
|
| Sorry if this may sound like a rather stupid question:
| (Referencing the examples section of man installboot(8))
|
| Can s.o. verifiy that instead of
| # installboot sd0
|
| it is equally safe to issue
Hi there!
Sorry if this may sound like a rather stupid question:
(Referencing the examples section of man installboot(8))
Can s.o. verifiy that instead of
# installboot sd0
it is equally safe to issue
# installboot
(the DUID itself, of course)?
My system is fully encrypted with sd1 usually
David Vasek [va...@fido.cz] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the new installboot(8) wipes the disk label on a 4k-byte/sector drive - a
> valid disk label becomes binary zeros after
> /usr/sbin/installboot -r /mnt sd4
>
> To be more precise, the "boot sector" (the first 512 b
Hello,
the new installboot(8) wipes the disk label on a 4k-byte/sector drive -
a valid disk label becomes binary zeros after
/usr/sbin/installboot -r /mnt sd4
To be more precise, the "boot sector" (the first 512 bytes) gets
installed, but the disk label (the next 512 bytes) is o
On 2006/09/23 02:36, Bertrand CHERRIER wrote:
> would you mind sharing how you did it ?
> I'm very interested !!
I don't mind sharing, but reading installboot(8) is a prerequisite,
because you need to understand what changes you're making with boot
blocks or you are likely to
Hi,
would you mind sharing how you did it ?
I'm very interested !!
Stuart Henderson a icrit :
On 2006/09/22 12:26, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Should i386 installboot be able to successfully install an amd64
bootloader?
ok, I worked out a way to try it now. Yes it does.
Now I get to al
On 2006/09/22 12:26, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Should i386 installboot be able to successfully install an amd64
> bootloader?
ok, I worked out a way to try it now. Yes it does.
Now I get to alter vlans on the switch since bsd.rd doesn't
know about them ;-)
Should i386 installboot be able to successfully install an amd64
bootloader?
I'd like to change arch on a remote box (I have console access
so I plan on just booting an amd64 bsd.rd at that point), pxe isn't
easily available, and I don't have a spare machine with a suitable
processor to try it on
12 matches
Mail list logo
