Bash and Zsh will already handle your first example without any
tinkering.
As Christian stated the completion systems are quite mature, I tend to
prefer zsh myself.
A good book that I recommend to get started is From Bash to Zsh. I
found it easier to start with rather the supplied reference
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 03:48:43PM -0500, Wayne Cuddy wrote:
A good book that I recommend to get started is From Bash to Zsh. I
found it easier to start with rather the supplied reference
documentation.
Does From Bash to Zsh cover ksh, csh, tcsh, etc...?
It sounds like a great book idea, but
No really.. a lot of the basics are applicable to ksh (*sh) but *csh
style shells aren't covered.
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 04:54:16PM -0500, Jonathon Sisson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 03:48:43PM -0500, Wayne Cuddy wrote:
A good book that I recommend to get started is From Bash to Zsh. I
Hi,
an interesting question has just come to my head:
do you know of any shell that could complete from the terminal output of
any of the previous command?
like for example:
i want it to complete from a result of ls, so I give the ls command,
look at its output, then for example
i type 'cat
On 2014-12-24, Gregory Edigarov ediga...@qarea.com wrote:
an interesting question has just come to my head:
do you know of any shell that could complete from the terminal output of
any of the previous command?
That would require serious contortions since the stdout/stderr
output of commands
From: Gregory Edigarov ediga...@qarea.com
Sent: Wed Dec 24 15:56:02 CET 2014
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: interesting question about shells
Hi,
an interesting question has just come to my head:
do you know of any shell that could complete
On 12/24/2014 06:19 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
On 2014-12-24, Gregory Edigarov ediga...@qarea.com wrote:
an interesting question has just come to my head:
do you know of any shell that could complete from the terminal output of
any of the previous command?
That would require serious
7 matches
Mail list logo
