Roger Neth Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> and it was okay on response. Then I redid my pf.conf with the tutorial
> by Jeff Hansteen posted a couple of days ago.
It's Peter, not Jeff, but I'm very happy to hear you found the tutorial
useful.
> Wow! what a difference. My DEC firewall is faster
Please note that at this time,
sasyncd can fail IPSEC associations to a 2nd machine
But not yet fail them back, when the master recovers
The developer of this stuff hasn't finished it yet.
tatefully, too. :)" ?
-Original Message-
From: Jason Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 02:07 AM
To: 'Edy Purnomo'
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: iptables vs pf
On Oct 19, 2005, at 6:21 PM, Edy Purnomo wrote:
i suggested to my friend
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have been moving a single Linux FW to a pair of OBSD
> machines, lured by carp and pfsync. This has been working
> well in my test environment. This also lead me to vpns
> running with ISAKMPD, replaceing a Freeswan box, and
> forestalling
x27;Edy Purnomo'
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: iptables vs pf
>
> On Oct 19, 2005, at 6:21 PM, Edy Purnomo wrote:
>
> > i suggested to my friend to replace his linux box to openbsd.
> > he uses mailnly for internet gateway : pf + squid proxy
> > after 2 weeks l
Hi,
Edy Purnomo wrote:
i suggested to my friend to replace his linux box to openbsd.
he uses mailnly for internet gateway : pf + squid proxy
after 2 weeks later he switched it back linux and said : linux much
faster to respond the http requests (he had a same configuration on
openbsd, pf + squ
On 10/20/05, Marc Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi roger,
>
> i searched in the archives at marc.theaimsgroup.com but didn't find the
> thread you mention. du you have a link for me?
>
> TIA,
> marc
>
> Roger Neth Jr schrieb:
> >
> >
> > Hello, I put OpenBSD 3.8 snapshot on an old DEC 500pws
On 10/19/05, Budhi Setiawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:43:38 -0700
> Roger Neth Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello, I put OpenBSD 3.8 snapshot on an old DEC 500pws with pf.conf
> > and it was okay on response. Then I redid my pf.conf with the tutorial
> > by Jeff Han
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:59:10 +0200, Jan Johansson wrote:
>
> And knowing thoose Linux dudes, maybe his Linux squid is a
> loadable kernel module so it will be uber fast, I mean crashing
> the machine instead of just squid is not really a problem now is
> it?
>
Yes, we know the Linux kernel is blo
I actually was reading a good document on PF tonight and I came across
this quote that I think would answer your question as to the difference
between iptables and pf.
OK, may be it's more poetic, but still I really liked it.
Hope it make you think as well! (:>
And I think it describe it very
Edy Purnomo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i suggested to my friend to replace his linux box to openbsd.
> he uses mailnly for internet gateway : pf + squid proxy after 2
> weeks later he switched it back linux and said : linux much
> faster to respond the http requests (he had a same
> configuration
On 10/19/05, Roger Neth Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, I put OpenBSD 3.8 snapshot on an old DEC 500pws with pf.conf
> and it was okay on response. Then I redid my pf.conf with the tutorial
> by Jeff Hansteen posted a couple of days ago.
>
I assume you meant the one posted by Peter N. M. Ha
On 10/19/05, Edy Purnomo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i suggested to my friend to replace his linux box to openbsd.
> he uses mailnly for internet gateway : pf + squid proxy
> after 2 weeks later he switched it back linux and said : linux much faster
> to respond the http requests (he had a same co
On Oct 19, 2005, at 6:21 PM, Edy Purnomo wrote:
i suggested to my friend to replace his linux box to openbsd.
he uses mailnly for internet gateway : pf + squid proxy
after 2 weeks later he switched it back linux and said : linux much
faster to respond the http requests (he had a same configura
Edy Purnomo wrote:
> i suggested to my friend to replace his linux box to openbsd. he
> uses mailnly for internet gateway : pf + squid proxy after 2
> weeks later he switched it back linux and said : linux much
> faster to respond the http requests (he had a same configuration
> on openbsd, pf + sq
Edy Purnomo wrote:
i suggested to my friend to replace his linux box to openbsd.
he uses mailnly for internet gateway : pf + squid proxy
after 2 weeks later he switched it back linux and said : linux much
faster to respond the http requests (he had a same configuration on
openbsd, pf + squid pr
> Edy Purnomo wrote:
> > i suggested to my friend to replace his linux box to
> openbsd. he uses
> > mailnly for internet gateway : pf + squid proxy after 2
> weeks later he
> > switched it back linux and said : linux much faster to respond the
> > http requests (he had a same configuration on
Edy Purnomo wrote:
> i suggested to my friend to replace his linux box to openbsd.
> he uses mailnly for internet gateway : pf + squid proxy
> after 2 weeks later he switched it back linux and said : linux much
> faster to respond the http requests (he had a same configuration on
> openbsd, pf + sq
i suggested to my friend to replace his linux box to openbsd.
he uses mailnly for internet gateway : pf + squid proxy
after 2 weeks later he switched it back linux and said : linux much faster
to respond the http requests (he had a same configuration on openbsd, pf +
squid proxy).
is there any
19 matches
Mail list logo
