On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:42:26AM -0400, Mike Small wrote:
> I can think of some people who would consider that a great gatekeeper
> for the profession: everyone has to write his or her own compiler
> for all the coding they do.
With enough time on my hands, sure, why not ?
But that's a main issu
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:18:21PM +0900, Jordi Beltran Creix wrote:
> 2010/3/16 Marc Espie :
...
> > the "C++ is crap, everything that matters should be written in C"
> > mentality.
...
> clang+LLVM is barely able of bootstrapping itself while already
> generating highly optimized code for C and O
2010/3/16 Marc Espie :
> Of course, it makes it completely impossible to hack on KDE if you're in
> the "C++ is crap, everything that matters should be written in C"
mentality.
> (in fact, KDE is probably the biggest example of readable C++ code I give
> to people. Doesn't hurt that it follows on t
> Java, on the other hand, from my limited experience trying to tutor
> someone in it, *is* crap :) [Well, that's probably too harsh, but it
> did give me a headache and RSI from all the damn typing.]
People claim Java is portable, when it's not. And a lot of java
programs use proprietary libra
On 03/16/2010 03:40 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
Well, most of their stuff does work on... windows these days. How non-portable
is that ?
Seriously, the issues about hal and policykit only impact you if you want
kde as a full desktop with all sysadmin. For most of us, who actually only
care about kde
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 09:13:16AM +0100, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> KDE cares in so far as they accept patches and would welcome a developer
> that targets OpenBSD. I know because I've talked to some of them on IRC.
>
> There's however no effort to do it themselves or even set up a testbox
> to make s
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:00:54PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 03:19:41PM +0100, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 04:33:03AM -0500, Donald Cooley wrote:
> > > openports shows that the openbsd version of kde4 is nearly two years
> > > old. are there any future
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Marc Espie wrote:
>> You're totally mistaken.
>>
>> KDE cares about the BSDs, and they're very much no-nonsense people.
>> I had absolutely no difficulty getting an account with them, nor with
>> folding back portable patches I had to make things work
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Marc Espie wrote:
> You're totally mistaken.
>
> KDE cares about the BSDs, and they're very much no-nonsense people.
> I had absolutely no difficulty getting an account with them, nor with
> folding back portable patches I had to make things work on OpenBSD.
>
> The main reas
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 03:19:41PM +0100, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 04:33:03AM -0500, Donald Cooley wrote:
> > openports shows that the openbsd version of kde4 is nearly two years
> > old. are there any future plans to update kde4?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Donald Cooley
>
> http:
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Brad Tilley wrote:
> > Actually, KDE only cares about Linux.
>
> The isfinite() issue? That's C99 and POSIX stuff, right? Or are you guys
> talking about something else? OpenBSD does have a log2() (unlike FreeBSD
> 7.x) even though you can get there by doing log()/log(2).
I'
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:56 -0400, "Brad Tilley"
wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:27 +0100, "Antoine Jacoutot"
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 04:33:03AM -0500, Donald Cooley wrote:
> > > > openports shows that the openbsd version of kde4 is n
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:27 +0100, "Antoine Jacoutot"
wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 04:33:03AM -0500, Donald Cooley wrote:
> > > openports shows that the openbsd version of kde4 is nearly two years
> > > old. are there any future plans to update kd
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 04:33:03AM -0500, Donald Cooley wrote:
> > openports shows that the openbsd version of kde4 is nearly two years
> > old. are there any future plans to update kde4?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Donald Cooley
>
> http://lists.kde.org/?l=k
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 04:33:03AM -0500, Donald Cooley wrote:
> openports shows that the openbsd version of kde4 is nearly two years
> old. are there any future plans to update kde4?
>
> Regards,
> Donald Cooley
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-devel&w=2&r=1&s=openbsd&q=b
KDE doesn't give a fuck abo
Sure.
Everybody is waiting for your patches :-)
2010/3/15 Donald Cooley
> openports shows that the openbsd version of kde4 is nearly two years
> old. are there any future plans to update kde4?
>
> Regards,
> Donald Cooley
openports shows that the openbsd version of kde4 is nearly two years
old. are there any future plans to update kde4?
Regards,
Donald Cooley
17 matches
Mail list logo
