Re: ksh93

2006-02-22 Thread Andreas Kahari
On 21/02/06, Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Luke Bakken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> I've built it before from that site so am guessing it has grown out of > >> date or become neglected. > > > > Do you really need

Re: ksh93

2006-02-21 Thread Harry Putnam
"Luke Bakken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I've built it before from that site so am guessing it has grown out of >> date or become neglected. > > Do you really need ksh93? pdksh should work just fine in 99.9% of your cases. No, in fact I can't site

Re: ksh93

2006-02-21 Thread Luke Bakken
> I see old messages on various obsd related lists about ksh93 having > been at least considered for a package and it not clear if it every > was a package, but at any rate does not appear to be now. > > I wondered if there is development on that or maybe unofficial > pac

ksh93

2006-02-21 Thread Harry Putnam
I see old messages on various obsd related lists about ksh93 having been at least considered for a package and it not clear if it every was a package, but at any rate does not appear to be now. I wondered if there is development on that or maybe unofficial packages or something. The reason I ask