On January 26, 2017 6:54:54 AM GMT+01:00, Alexander Hall
wrote:
>On January 25, 2017 10:44:19 AM GMT+01:00, "Peter N. M. Hansteen"
> wrote:
>>On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:04:40AM +, Luke Small wrote:
>>> if I have:
>>> "pass out quick on lo0 from self port 6379 to \ any user luke
>>>
>>> block o
On January 25, 2017 10:44:19 AM GMT+01:00, "Peter N. M. Hansteen"
wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:04:40AM +, Luke Small wrote:
>> if I have:
>> "pass out quick on lo0 from self port 6379 to \ any user luke
>>
>> block out quick on lo0 from self port 6379 to any
>>
>> pass quick on lo0 from
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:04:40AM +, Luke Small wrote:
> if I have:
> "pass out quick on lo0 from self port 6379 to \ any user luke
>
> block out quick on lo0 from self port 6379 to any
>
> pass quick on lo0 from any to any"
>
> a local connection to port 6379 will go to the last rule... is
On 24.01.2017 16:04, Luke Small wrote:
if I have:
"pass out quick on lo0 from self port 6379 to \ any user luke
block out quick on lo0 from self port 6379 to any
pass quick on lo0 from any to any"
a local connection to port 6379 will go to the last rule... isn't
this a
useful feature to allo
if I have:
"pass out quick on lo0 from self port 6379 to \ any user luke
block out quick on lo0 from self port 6379 to any
pass quick on lo0 from any to any"
a local connection to port 6379 will go to the last rule... isn't this a
useful feature to allow one of the first two rules to take effect
5 matches
Mail list logo