On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 02:14:02PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
I committed build system changes to install source manuals
and no longer install formatted manuals from 5.0 onwards.
This is nice, now I can do something like this in /etc/man.conf:
_build.[1-9n]
Hi Michal,
Michal Mazurek wrote on Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:02:05AM +0200:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 02:14:02PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
I committed build system changes to install source manuals
and no longer install formatted manuals from 5.0 onwards.
This is nice, now I can do something
On 24/10/2011 11:02, Michal Mazurek wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 02:14:02PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
I committed build system changes to install source manuals
and no longer install formatted manuals from 5.0 onwards.
This is nice, now I can do something like this in /etc/man.conf:
Hi Douglas,
Jason McIntyre wrote on Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 03:27:11PM +0100:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 01:01:41AM +1100, Douglas Ray wrote:
OpenBSD 4.9 has /usr/share/man/cat* populated, but not
/usr/share/man/man[0-9n] .
What options are there to populate man[0-9n]/ ?
A complete build of
Ingo and Jason, thanks...
On 23/10/2011 11:14 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Hi Douglas,
Jason McIntyre wrote on Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 03:27:11PM +0100:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 01:01:41AM +1100, Douglas Ray wrote:
OpenBSD 4.9 has /usr/share/man/cat* populated, but not
/usr/share/man/man[0-9n] .
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011, Douglas Ray wrote:
If I get anywhere useful, might there be any interest in
posting a manman49.tgz on ftp.openbsd.org? ... a small
addendum, for those of us bitten by OpenBSD 4.9's little
excursion from BSD habit?
No, the man sources are already in the source tree.
Is
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 03:04:41AM +1100, Douglas Ray wrote:
If I get anywhere useful, might there be any interest in
posting a manman49.tgz on ftp.openbsd.org? ... a small
addendum, for those of us bitten by OpenBSD 4.9's little
excursion from BSD habit?
note that ingo discussed 4.9,
Douglas Ray doug...@cpan.org wrote:
If I get anywhere useful, might there be any interest in
posting a manman49.tgz on ftp.openbsd.org? ... a small
addendum, for those of us bitten by OpenBSD 4.9's little
excursion from BSD habit?
OpenBSD has only ever installed the cat pages. That little
Hi Douglas,
Christian Weisgerber wrote on Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 05:27:06PM +:
Douglas Ray doug...@cpan.org wrote:
If I get anywhere useful, might there be any interest in
posting a manman49.tgz on ftp.openbsd.org? ... a small
addendum, for those of us bitten by OpenBSD 4.9's little
Regarding the brute force approach, good luck backporting the
build system changes 28 times (from 5.0 to 2.2), demonstrating
that the backport is correct and not missing any manuals in any
version, and then finding a machine that is still in working order,
able to run 2.2, and fast enough to
Theo de Raadt wrote on Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:01:18PM -0600:
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Regarding the brute force approach, good luck backporting the
build system changes 28 times (from 5.0 to 2.2), demonstrating
that the backport is correct and not missing any manuals in any
version, and then
Oh right. 5.1 is going to be the first release where all
machine-dependent manuals for all architectures will be
installed on all other architectures as well, such that
there is no longer any risk that you miss whole pages for,
say, the binutils of the GCC 2 era just because you happen
to
OpenBSD 4.9 has /usr/share/man/cat* populated, but not
/usr/share/man/man[0-9n] .
What options are there to populate man[0-9n]/ ?
A complete build of kernel and userland seems extreme.
The man49.tgz set contains only the cat* content.
(Was that intended?)
The src49.tgz set has a small subset
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 01:01:41AM +1100, Douglas Ray wrote:
OpenBSD 4.9 has /usr/share/man/cat* populated, but not
/usr/share/man/man[0-9n] .
What options are there to populate man[0-9n]/ ?
A complete build of kernel and userland seems extreme.
The man49.tgz set contains only the cat*
14 matches
Mail list logo
