00, Wild Karl-Heinz wrote:
> In message "pf tagging and matching over more than one interface ..."
>on 11.11.2005, David fire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Df> you only tag the package to port 1194 in both case and you are allowing
> only
> Df> tagge
In message "pf tagging and matching over more than one interface ..."
on 11.11.2005, David fire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Df> you only tag the package to port 1194 in both case and you are allowing only
Df> tagged packaged to ports 22, 80, 443
Port 1194 on wan_if is ha
hi
you only tag the package to port 1194 in both case and you are allowing only
tagged packaged to ports 22, 80, 443
David
2005/11/11, Karl-Heinz Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I try to tag a connection on the wan_if and
> accordingly on the tag I'll restrict the
> access on an other interface li
I try to tag a connection on the wan_if and
accordingly on the tag I'll restrict the
access on an other interface like.
an example ...
pass in quick on wan_if proto tcp from to port 1194 tag NORM
keep state
pass in quick on wan_if proto tcp from to port 1194 tag POWER
keep state
pass in
4 matches
Mail list logo
