On 11/13/18 16:28, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2018/11/13 10:15, Andrew wrote:
On 11/13/18 11:08, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018-11-11, Andrew wrote:
> > ~: doas pfctl -t cidr_typo -T add 1.2.3.4*5
> > 1 table created.
> > 1/1 addresses added.
>
> This would normally fail right here.
>
> > ~:
On 2018/11/13 10:15, Andrew wrote:
> On 11/13/18 11:08, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2018-11-11, Andrew wrote:
> > > ~: doas pfctl -t cidr_typo -T add 1.2.3.4*5
> > > 1 table created.
> > > 1/1 addresses added.
> >
> > This would normally fail right here.
> >
> > > ~: doas pfctl -t cidr_typo -
On 11/13/18 11:08, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2018-11-11, Andrew wrote:
~: doas pfctl -t cidr_typo -T add 1.2.3.4*5
1 table created.
1/1 addresses added.
This would normally fail right here.
~: doas pfctl -t cidr_typo -T show
127.0.0.1
I think your name resolver may be giving out 127.0
On 2018-11-11, Andrew wrote:
> ~: doas pfctl -t cidr_typo -T add 1.2.3.4*5
> 1 table created.
> 1/1 addresses added.
This would normally fail right here.
> ~: doas pfctl -t cidr_typo -T show
>127.0.0.1
I think your name resolver may be giving out 127.0.0.1 as an address
in respons
On 11/11/18 19:23, Klemens Nanni wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 12:01:33PM -0600, Andrew wrote:
~: doas pfctl -t cidr_typo -T add 1.2.3.4*5
1 table created.
1/1 addresses added.
I fail to reproduce this with recent snapshots on both amd64 and sparc64:
# pfctl -t cidr_typo -T add 1.2.3.
On 11/11/18 19:23, Klemens Nanni wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 12:01:33PM -0600, Andrew wrote:
~: doas pfctl -t cidr_typo -T add 1.2.3.4*5
1 table created.
1/1 addresses added.
I fail to reproduce this with recent snapshots on both amd64 and sparc64:
# pfctl -t cidr_typo -T add 1.2.3.
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 12:01:33PM -0600, Andrew wrote:
> ~: doas pfctl -t cidr_typo -T add 1.2.3.4*5
> 1 table created.
> 1/1 addresses added.
I fail to reproduce this with recent snapshots on both amd64 and sparc64:
# pfctl -t cidr_typo -T add 1.2.3.4*5
no IP address found for 1.
I stumbled upon this because the "/" and the "*" keys are adjacent to
each other on a numeric keypad.
Note: This is a (GENERIC) kernel and I have hyper-threading disabled on
this laptop, if that matters ???
Just your basic upgrade to -current ...
- download today's SHA256.sig, bsd.rd, install
8 matches
Mail list logo