On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 06:24:46AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> Does the eventual game plan for make -j include the ability to build on
> a "cluster" of systems?
No.
If you're in ports land, you already have dpb for that.
For compilers, you have distcc.
In fact, I removed whatever code there w
On Saturday 01 December 2007, Marc Espie wrote:
> Well, it's time for an update on how things are going in make-land.
> The initial pass at getting make -j in shape was enough to get it to
> work in most cases. As usual, when you start down an unused code
> path, it also uncovered a lot of issues,
Well, it's time for an update on how things are going in make-land.
The initial pass at getting make -j in shape was enough to get it to
work in most cases. As usual, when you start down an unused code path,
it also uncovered a lot of issues, some of them fairly small, others
really big.
If you re
3 matches
Mail list logo