{ This is a resend. No replies after 24 hours }
Running OBSD 4.0 here.
I was under the impression that spamd only did greylisting and dynamic
whitelisting. Static blacklisting available via spamd-setup (and
pseudo-whitelisting; of some of those blacklisted hosts).
But not dynamic
Juan Miscaro wrote:
{ This is a resend. No replies after 24 hours }
Running OBSD 4.0 here.
I was under the impression that spamd only did greylisting and dynamic
whitelisting. Static blacklisting available via spamd-setup (and
pseudo-whitelisting; of some of those blacklisted hosts).
But
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 10:30:45AM -0400, Juan Miscaro wrote:
{ This is a resend. No replies after 24 hours }
Running OBSD 4.0 here.
I was under the impression that spamd only did greylisting and dynamic
whitelisting. Static blacklisting available via spamd-setup (and
Juan Miscaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
{ This is a resend. No replies after 24 hours }
That could have been due to too little information.
Running OBSD 4.0 here.
I was under the impression that spamd only did greylisting and dynamic
whitelisting. Static blacklisting available via
--- Peter N. M. Hansteen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juan Miscaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
{ This is a resend. No replies after 24 hours }
That could have been due to too little information.
Running OBSD 4.0 here.
I was under the impression that spamd only did greylisting and
--- Jacob Yocom-Piatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juan Miscaro wrote:
{ This is a resend. No replies after 24 hours }
Running OBSD 4.0 here.
I was under the impression that spamd only did greylisting and
dynamic
whitelisting. Static blacklisting available via spamd-setup (and
--- Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 10:30:45AM -0400, Juan Miscaro wrote:
{ This is a resend. No replies after 24 hours }
Running OBSD 4.0 here.
I was under the impression that spamd only did greylisting and
dynamic
whitelisting. Static
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 09:09:24PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/09/18 13:48, Juan Miscaro wrote:
I _am_ using blacklists with spamd-setup and I _did_ check the
blacklisted hosts immediately after seeing the message. Perhaps my
command is messed up:
sudo pfctl -t spamd -T
On 2007/09/18 13:48, Juan Miscaro wrote:
I _am_ using blacklists with spamd-setup and I _did_ check the
blacklisted hosts immediately after seeing the message. Perhaps my
command is messed up:
sudo pfctl -t spamd -T show | grep 65.216.123.37
yes, most blacklists use cidr prefixes.
--- Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 09:09:24PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/09/18 13:48, Juan Miscaro wrote:
I _am_ using blacklists with spamd-setup and I _did_ check the
blacklisted hosts immediately after seeing the message. Perhaps
my
Running OBSD 4.0 here.
I was under the impression that spamd only did greylisting and dynamic
whitelisting. Static blacklisting available via spamd-setup (and
pseudo-whitelisting; of some of those blacklisted hosts).
But not dynamic blacklisting.
I occasionally get log messages like:
11 matches
Mail list logo