Re: s/nfs_server/nfsd_flags/

2012-03-17 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:10:54AM +0001, Jason McIntyre wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:31:48AM -0300, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: Hi, according to rc.conf v1.149, nfs_server was removed and left just as backward compatibility. However, manpage for rc.conf still refers to nfs_server

Re: s/nfs_server/nfsd_flags/

2012-03-15 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:31:48AM -0300, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: Hi, according to rc.conf v1.149, nfs_server was removed and left just as backward compatibility. However, manpage for rc.conf still refers to nfs_server as an example for the second section. FAQ section 6.7 also uses

Re: s/nfs_server/nfsd_flags/

2012-03-15 Thread Daniel Bolgheroni
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:10:54AM +0001, Jason McIntyre wrote: i don;t think anyone poking their nose in /etc/rc.conf will think they are looking at four sections. BTW, this is another point I was going to make. I tried very hard to distinguish between these four sections as it is now, but I

s/nfs_server/nfsd_flags/

2012-03-13 Thread Daniel Bolgheroni
Hi, according to rc.conf v1.149, nfs_server was removed and left just as backward compatibility. However, manpage for rc.conf still refers to nfs_server as an example for the second section. FAQ section 6.7 also uses nfs_server instead of the newer nfsd_flags. Cheers,