On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 18:32:24 +0100
Gaby vanhegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 16 Oct 2005, at 15:47, Wijnand Wiersma wrote:
> > I thought scponly has chroot functionality builtin.
>
> Yes it does, and you can't link outside of that chroot. Also, you
> have to setup the chroot to have all th
** Reply to message from Gaby vanhegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 16
Oct 2005 18:34:54 +0100
>On 16 Oct 2005, at 17:13, Dave Anderson wrote:
>
>>> That being said, FTP is well past the time it was designed for.
>>> OpenSSH
>>> is very stable and featurefull. Just make sure it isn't *too*
>>>
On 16 Oct 2005, at 17:13, Dave Anderson wrote:
>> That being said, FTP is well past the time it was designed for.
>> OpenSSH
>> is very stable and featurefull. Just make sure it isn't *too*
>> featureful
>> for what you're doing.
>
> There _is_ one useful-to-me feature of FTP that I can't find
On 16 Oct 2005, at 15:47, Wijnand Wiersma wrote:
> 2
>> 1. Continue using scponly but with chroot and then linking the
>> directories inside their home directories.
>
> I thought scponly has chroot functionality builtin.
Yes it does, and you can't link outside of that chroot. Also, you
have
** Reply to message from Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Sun, 16 Oct 2005 16:34:21 +0200
>That being said, FTP is well past the time it was designed for. OpenSSH
>is very stable and featurefull. Just make sure it isn't *too* featureful
>for what you're doing.
There _is_ one useful-to-me f
> On 10/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2. Using vsftpd which support ssl both on login and on the data transfer
> > (prefered),
> > and then using the buildin support for jailing users. Then linking the
> > directories
> > inside their home directories.
>
> I've successfu
2005/10/15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 1. Continue using scponly but with chroot and then linking the directories
> inside their home directories.
I thought scponly has chroot functionality builtin.
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 04:32:52PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently working with one of our file servers. Users need access to the
> server from where they live and so far I have been using sshd with scponly.
>
> I have used scponly because I don't want them to have a sh
Hi,
I am currently working with one of our file servers. Users need access to the
server from where they live and so far I have been using sshd with scponly.
I have used scponly because I don't want them to have a shell.
The problem with the setup is that not al the users may access all the fi
9 matches
Mail list logo
