On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Joel Carnat wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was really annoyed by the numbers I got. So I did the testings again.
> Using
> a brand new VM. Being really careful on what I was doing and writing it
> down
> after each command run. I did the testings using
Hello,
I was really annoyed by the numbers I got. So I did the testings again.
Using
a brand new VM. Being really careful on what I was doing and writing it
down
after each command run. I did the testings using 6.1 and 6.2-current, in
case
there were some changes. There weren't.
First of
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 07:32:49PM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> I'm not a developer but I know 6.1 moved to a shiny new side channel
> resistant AES. I seem to remember Theo saying that if it is that slow
> then even worse; people won't use encryption at all and if they need
> side channel
On Fri, 15 Sep 2017 12:24:32 +0200
> I noticed that there were a huge difference between
> plain and encrypted filesystem using OpenBSD.
I'm not a developer but I know 6.1 moved to a shiny new side channel
resistant AES. I seem to remember Theo saying that if it is that slow
then even worse;
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:24:32PM +0200, Joel Carnat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Initially comparing I/O speed between FreeBSD/ZFS/GELI and
> OpenBSD/FFS/CRYPTO, I noticed that there were a huge difference between
> plain and encrypted filesystem using OpenBSD. I ran the test on a 1
> vCore/1GB RAM Vultr
Hi,
Initially comparing I/O speed between FreeBSD/ZFS/GELI and
OpenBSD/FFS/CRYPTO, I noticed that there were a huge difference between
plain and encrypted filesystem using OpenBSD. I ran the test on a 1
vCore/1GB RAM Vultr VPS, running OpenBSD 6.2-beta. I had / configured in
plain FFS and
6 matches
Mail list logo