On Aug 4, 2007 Peter Fraser wrote:
I think that the problem is a bad mail program at your clients,
A user should not see the 250 status, it is not a
failure of any sort but I have seen it as a return
status sent to a user.
Here is an example that I have seen from someone who sent us
a message. T
; -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Tom Bombadil
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 02:37 PM
> To: Peter Fraser
> Cc: 'misc@openbsd.org'
> Subject: Re: spamd - 250 return text
>
>
> As far as I understand from th
As far as I understand from them, the sysadmin was showing the defer to
his boss using a telnet session, and the boss got pissed off, because
they are actually very diligent about their spam policies.
Anyways, I just wanted to know if it there was another way to change the
250 messages without cha
On 8/4/07, Tom Bombadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've had a pretty hard time from a client saying how "rude" this
> default message is. Even though their tech people didn't care, the
> people higher up got really offended... Quite understandably I'd say,
> since these "greetings" aren't really
I think that the problem is a bad mail program at your clients,
A user should not see the 250 status, it is not a
failure of any sort but I have seen it as a return
status sent to a user.
Here is an example that I have seen from someone who sent us
a message. The message failed and this is the sta
> Editing the binary? (Is recompiling really so hard?)
Not hard, just changed it right now... But sometimes it pays to ask
around to see if there is a simpler way that doesn't involve messing
around with the original source code.
> Ah, you'll be looking for the OpenBSD Corporate Edition - with su
Tom Bombadil wrote:
Hi all,
Short of recompiling spamd, is there any undocumented way of changing
the 250 responses from spamd?
- 250 Hello, spam sender. Pleased to be wasting your time.
- 250 You are about to try to deliver spam. Your time will be spent, for
nothing.
"man spamd" and a quick s
On 2007/08/03 13:59, Tom Bombadil wrote:
> Short of recompiling spamd, is there any undocumented way of changing
> the 250 responses from spamd?
Editing the binary? (Is recompiling really so hard?)
> Sorry to bug you guys with this lame "problem" but in the financial
> world, people can be very t
On 8/3/07, Tom Bombadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Short of recompiling spamd, is there any undocumented way of changing
> the 250 responses from spamd?
>
> - 250 Hello, spam sender. Pleased to be wasting your time.
> - 250 You are about to try to deliver spam. Your time will be spent
writes Tom Bombadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: spamd - 250 return text
...
> Short of recompiling spamd, is there any undocumented way of changing
> the 250 responses from spamd?
...
Sure. It's called "bvi".
-Marcus Watts
Hi all,
Short of recompiling spamd, is there any undocumented way of changing
the 250 responses from spamd?
- 250 Hello, spam sender. Pleased to be wasting your time.
- 250 You are about to try to deliver spam. Your time will be spent, for
nothing.
"man spamd" and a quick search in the ML archiv
11 matches
Mail list logo
