Greets
>> Wouldn't distributing a traplist make it prone to being poisoned? i.e. a
>> pissed off spammer adding a legit email to the traplist.
I plugged in the traplist recently while mostly asleep ( late night )
at the keyboard.
Next day I spen an hour and a half examining my mail server beca
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:46:02AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I really think spammers don't give a damn about coming back to deliver
> e-mail properly. The new breed of spammers uses botnets to deliver their
> crap. And since those systems are not theirs and that bandwidth is not
> theirs, t
* smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-01 17:15]:
> On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:38:37 -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote
> > May be if there was a way to distribute one own addition only may be
> > a good idea as then we could merge traplist from multiple locations
> > if one wants to do this. I wouldn't have
On 02/01, Bob Beck wrote:
> Yeah, probably time to retire spews, they aren't going
> to fix it.
>
> Aside from my traplist (which I'll add) anyone have
> any suggestions for useful addtions when I commit this? I seldom
> use exernally maintained blacklists anymore :)
>
> -Bob
On 2007/02/03 10:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Second rule:
> Those who do send spam should be blocked from sending e-mail until they
> have cleaned their system. And I know, most people that are infected by
> a Trojan sending spam, do not know how to get rid of it. Providers
> should deliver some
I really think spammers don't give a damn about coming back to deliver
e-mail properly. The new breed of spammers uses botnets to deliver their
crap. And since those systems are not theirs and that bandwidth is not
theirs, they write software to act as a proper mail server. That means,
they come ba
On Friday, February 2, 2007, 04:02:38, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> ...
> Yeah, greylisting is good, but this is for only short while, I am
> afraid. My measurements telling me that spamers are adapting quicker
> then somebody expected.
>
> It seems like their soft started analyzing the return c
It seems like their soft started analyzing the return codes, and so they are
resending their mail after a short while. So I think blacklisting is still in
rule.
--
Since greylisting has become more defacto, I have seen more
successfull 411 like spam squeezing through "legitimate" email
serv
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
the only blacklist i use is one i generate for a chunk of the
OptInBig.com TLDs. besides that, greylisting does a great job.
Yeah, greylisting is good, but this is for only short while, I am
afraid. My measurements telling me that spamers are adapting quicker
then
Bob Beck wrote:
> Aside from my traplist (which I'll add) anyone have
> any suggestions for useful addtions when I commit this? I seldom
> use exernally maintained blacklists anymore :)
I use a script that extracts addresses from the blacklist at
http://www.heise.de/ix/nixspam/dnsbl_en/. It
smith wrote:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:38:37 -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote
May be if there was a way to distribute one own addition only may be
a good idea as then we could merge traplist from multiple locations
if one wants to do this. I wouldn't have any objection to make mine
available if that h
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:38:37 -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote
> May be if there was a way to distribute one own addition only may be
> a good idea as then we could merge traplist from multiple locations
> if one wants to do this. I wouldn't have any objection to make mine
> available if that help.
>
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Bob Beck wrote:
Yeah, probably time to retire spews, they aren't going
to fix it.
Aside from my traplist (which I'll add) anyone have
any suggestions for useful addtions when I commit this? I seldom
use exernally maintained blacklists anymore :)
-Bob
Not that
On Thursday 01 February 2007 09:25, Bob Beck wrote:
> Yeah, probably time to retire spews, they aren't going
> to fix it.
>
> Aside from my traplist (which I'll add) anyone have
> any suggestions for useful addtions when I commit this? I seldom
> use exernally maintained blacklists
Bob Beck wrote:
Yeah, probably time to retire spews, they aren't going
to fix it.
Aside from my traplist (which I'll add) anyone have
any suggestions for useful addtions when I commit this? I seldom
use exernally maintained blacklists anymore :)
-Bob
Not that it ca
Yeah, probably time to retire spews, they aren't going
to fix it.
Aside from my traplist (which I'll add) anyone have
any suggestions for useful addtions when I commit this? I seldom
use exernally maintained blacklists anymore :)
-Bob
* Josh Grosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
1) According to www.spews.org, the text files for SPEWS level 1 and 2 have
not been updated since August, 2006.
2) There has been much discussion of this in both
news.admin.net-abuse.blocklisting, and in news.admin.net-abuse.email.
3) As of today, SO
17 matches
Mail list logo
