Re: syncing hardware clock

2013-02-07 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 05:52:08PM +0200, Lars Nooden wrote: > On Thu, 7 Feb 2013, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 03:36:43PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > > > > Lars Nooden wrote: > > > > > > > I've got a small system running 5.2-stable and the clock seems off. >

Re: syncing hardware clock

2013-02-07 Thread Lars Nooden
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 03:36:43PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > > Lars Nooden wrote: > > > > > I've got a small system running 5.2-stable and the clock seems off. NTP > > > is making entries like this on startup: > > > > > > Jan 31 10:15:

Re: syncing hardware clock

2013-02-07 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 03:36:43PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Lars Nooden wrote: > > > I've got a small system running 5.2-stable and the clock seems off. NTP > > is making entries like this on startup: > > > > Jan 31 10:15:31 net5501 ntpd[20060]: adjusting local clock by 93.846882

Re: syncing hardware clock

2013-02-07 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Lars Nooden wrote: > I've got a small system running 5.2-stable and the clock seems off. NTP > is making entries like this on startup: > > Jan 31 10:15:31 net5501 ntpd[20060]: adjusting local clock by 93.846882s > > I've looked around in the mail archives for various mailing lists and have

syncing hardware clock

2013-02-07 Thread Lars Nooden
I've got a small system running 5.2-stable and the clock seems off. NTP is making entries like this on startup: Jan 31 10:15:31 net5501 ntpd[20060]: adjusting local clock by 93.846882s I've looked around in the mail archives for various mailing lists and have the impression that a proper shut