sysmerge complains about not valid etcXX.tgz set

2014-01-25 Thread Markus Lude
Hello, today I updated to the latest snapshot on sparc64 (from 22nd january). When I run sysmerge after that I got $ sudo sysmerge -s etc55.tgz -x xetc55.tgz *** ERROR: /var/tmp/sysmerge.Hwq1ImlHSs/etc55.tgz is not a valid etcXX.tgz set Any ideas what might go wrong here? Regards, Mark

Re: sysmerge complains about not valid etcXX.tgz set

2014-01-25 Thread Christer Solskogen
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Markus Lude wrote: > Hello, > > today I updated to the latest snapshot on sparc64 (from 22nd january). > When I run sysmerge after that I got > > $ sudo sysmerge -s etc55.tgz -x xetc55.tgz > *** ERROR: /var/tmp/sysmerge.Hwq1ImlHSs/etc55.tgz is not a valid

Re: sysmerge complains about not valid etcXX.tgz set

2014-01-25 Thread Markus Lude
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 06:18:58PM +0100, Markus Lude wrote: > Hello, > > today I updated to the latest snapshot on sparc64 (from 22nd january). > When I run sysmerge after that I got > > $ sudo sysmerge -s etc55.tgz -x xetc55.tgz > *** ERROR: /var/tmp/sysmerge.Hwq1ImlHSs/etc55.tgz is not

Re: sysmerge complains about not valid etcXX.tgz set

2014-01-25 Thread Fritjof Bornebusch
Use sysmerge -S -s etc55.tgz -x xetc55.tgz And verify the etc archives manually as described in the signify manpage. Looks like there is a problem with sysmerge and signify. Fritjof Markus Lude wrote: >Hello, > >today I updated to the latest snapshot on sparc64 (from 22nd january). >When I run

Re: sysmerge complains about not valid etcXX.tgz set

2014-01-25 Thread Norman Golisz
On Sat Jan 25 2014 18:18, Markus Lude wrote: > Hello, > > today I updated to the latest snapshot on sparc64 (from 22nd january). > When I run sysmerge after that I got > > $ sudo sysmerge -s etc55.tgz -x xetc55.tgz > *** ERROR: /var/tmp/sysmerge.Hwq1ImlHSs/etc55.tgz is not a valid > etcX