I do have one more question. I have the config below. I can ping the
vether0 address from the other side of the tunnel from either host.
Also, all IP addresses mentioned are publicly routable.
On host1:
ifconfig em0 1.1.1.1/24 up
ifconfig gif0 tunnel 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 up
ifconfig vether0 1.1.2.1/30
I knew it was something stupid. I added
set skip on { gif0 vether0 }
to pf.conf for testing and everything started working. Sorry for the noise.
Bryan
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
>> I am having a hard time getting a non-encrypted gif(4) tunnel working.
>> Can anyone share a working config? I think if I can get gif(4) working
>> right then I can get vether(4) working as well. Thanks again!
>>
>
> ifconfig gif0 tunnel 19
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:16:43AM -0400, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Claudio Jeker
> wrote:
> > This will not work because em0 is having the clonable route for
> > 172.16.0/24 and so arp is unable to work on vether0 since you created an
> > addressing conflict.
>
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This will not work because em0 is having the clonable route for
> 172.16.0/24 and so arp is unable to work on vether0 since you created an
> addressing conflict.
Thank you for your response. I have been testing it further and I
think I under
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 02:31:18PM -0400, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> I am testing vether(4) and I am wondering if this is a use case that
> should work.
>
> ifconfig em0 172.16.0.10/24 up
> ifconfig bridge0 create
> ifconfig vether0 create
> ifconfig bridge0 add em0 add vether0 up
> ifconfig vether
I am testing vether(4) and I am wondering if this is a use case that
should work.
ifconfig em0 172.16.0.10/24 up
ifconfig bridge0 create
ifconfig vether0 create
ifconfig bridge0 add em0 add vether0 up
ifconfig vether0 172.16.0.11/24 up
I can't ping the vether0 IP address from other hosts on the s
7 matches
Mail list logo
