On 2016-05-31, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about the implementation of W^X protection.
> We now have a per filesystem knob wxallowed. but wouldn't it be better
> to implement with per-exec granularity?
>
> i.e. chflags wxallowed
We have this now, with ld -z wxneeded
Hi,
I have a question about the implementation of W^X protection.
We now have a per filesystem knob wxallowed. but wouldn't it be better
to implement with per-exec granularity?
i.e. chflags wxallowed
--
With best regards,
Gregory Edigarov
2 matches
Mail list logo