subject:"wx violations \(a question\)"

Re: wx violations (a question)

2016-05-31 Thread Stuart Henderson

On 2016-05-31, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question about the implementation of W^X protection. > We now have a per filesystem knob wxallowed. but wouldn't it be better > to implement with per-exec granularity? > > i.e. chflags wxallowed We have this now, with

wx violations (a question)

2016-05-31 Thread Gregory Edigarov

Hi, I have a question about the implementation of W^X protection. We now have a per filesystem knob wxallowed. but wouldn't it be better to implement with per-exec granularity? i.e. chflags wxallowed -- With best regards, Gregory Edigarov