Hello!
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 12:40:12AM -0200, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Hey folks,
sorry, but i found this on the web. May someone tell if it is serious,
i myself could not believe it.
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=424451seqNum=1
I don't agree with most things, but a few
On 07/11/2005, at 1:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Everything is a stream of bytes.
Reminds me of that saying which goes something like...
How do you eat an elephant? One mouthful at a time.
Microsoft tries to put the whole elephant in its mouth all at once, then
dies choking on it. Then
At first I thought perhaps my sarcasm detector (now _there's_ a real
useful invention!) was broken, but apparently this guy is serious.
To put a new twist on the old aphorism:
Those who do not understand the UNIX Hater's Handbook are doomed to
reinvent it poorly. (Or maybe plagiarize it poorly,
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 06:22:29AM -0600, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
At first I thought perhaps my sarcasm detector (now _there's_ a real
useful invention!) was broken, but apparently this guy is serious.
I'm seriously falling into this troll trap.. oh well. It's an
interesting article but in
Nick Holland wrote
The whole C doesn't do strings has always been complete Bull Sh*t in
my mind. C does strings like the processor underneath does -- it
doesn't make complex operations involving moving thousands of bytes look
simple. While I do use Perl for some apps, the stuff it lets you
I always thought that the number one reason Unix sucked as lack of
support for Mind-Reading Markup Language so I don't have to use any
input device anymore.
I guess I was wrong.
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 12:40:12AM -0200, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Hey folks,
sorry, but i found this on the web. May someone tell if it is serious,
i myself could not believe it.
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=424451seqNum=1
Looks like a rehash of
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:40:12 -0200, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey folks,
sorry, but i found this on the web. May someone tell if it is serious,
i myself could not believe it.
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=424451seqNum=1
I didn't even bother loading the page... if
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 12:40:12AM -0200, Gustavo
Rios wrote:
Hey folks,
sorry, but i found this on the web. May someone
tell if it is serious,
i myself could not believe it.
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=4244
51seqNum=1
Looks like a rehash of
Hey folks,
sorry, but i found this on the web. May someone tell if it is serious,
i myself could not believe it.
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=424451seqNum=1
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:40:12 -0200
Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey folks,
sorry, but i found this on the web. May someone tell if it is serious,
i myself could not believe it.
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=424451seqNum=1
Just another troll for 10+ pages of
On 06/11/2005, at 3:32 PM, Damien Miller wrote:
Don't bother giving the publication the benefit of the page
impressions.
If anyone still wants to read it, but wish to avoid the adverts, this is
the printer friendly version:
http://www.informit.com/articles/printerfriendly.asp?p=424451
http://www.informit.com/authors/bio.asp?
a=79c6e6ec-5bc6-49a8-8d5d-0fccd04b1a7b
He's a CS major working on a PhD in autonomic computing and co-
authored a Red Hat Linux book. Of course he's bitter and hasn't got
the full picture. ;-)
His complaints are either edge cases, or simply wrong.
Gustavo Rios wrote:
Hey folks,
sorry, but i found this on the web. May someone tell if it is serious,
i myself could not believe it.
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=424451seqNum=1
The author is taking themselves seriously. I don't recommend you make
the same mistake.
1)
14 matches
Mail list logo
