Gunderson wrote:
Greets:
I've been exploring root on raidframe w/a pair of mirrored disks. Once
I bring something like this up I then go ahead and do my best to break
it, test out recovery scenarios, etc.
smart. VERY smart. :)
Thnx;-)
Which brings me to the question
Greets:
I've been exploring root on raidframe w/a pair of mirrored disks. Once
I bring something like this up I then go ahead and do my best to break
it, test out recovery scenarios, etc. Which brings me to the question
at hand.
Following a hard failure the system must perfomr a parity check
On 10/23/05, Ken Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now my question is whether there is some way to shorten
this delay that I'm missing?
Did you read through the list archives? This matter is well-discussed.
Other OS'es, such as NetBSD, use a different way for the checking of
parity (i.e. in
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:43:26 +0200
Rogier Krieger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/23/05, Ken Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now my question is whether there is some way to shorten
this delay that I'm missing?
Did you read through the list archives? This matter is well-discussed.
Other
Ken Gunderson wrote:
Greets:
I've been exploring root on raidframe w/a pair of mirrored disks. Once
I bring something like this up I then go ahead and do my best to break
it, test out recovery scenarios, etc.
smart. VERY smart. :)
Which brings me to the question
at hand.
Following
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:42:35 -0400
Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ken Gunderson wrote:
Greets:
I've been exploring root on raidframe w/a pair of mirrored disks. Once
I bring something like this up I then go ahead and do my best to break
it, test out recovery scenarios, etc
6 matches
Mail list logo
