Re: using SPF or DKIM instead of greylisting?

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:35:45AM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:26:18AM +0200, Ji Navr??til wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I???m using pf greylisting on OpenBSD. More and more emails from Google are > > delayed and few are not delivered at all. > > > > This https://su

Re: Meaning of "from local"

I apologize for the noise I've created. I did not read the documentation closely. I found a definitive answer to my question in the "listen on" directive, which states: If the auth parameter is used, then a client may only start an SMTP transaction after a successful authentication. Any remote

Re: Meaning of "from local"

Panagiotis Atmatzidis wrote, On 05/30/14 05:58: My network consists of two subnets: 10.0.9.0/24 and 10.0.10.0/24. The OpenSMTPD server is at 10.0.9.20. The email client is at 10.0.10.24. The mail server will relay mail to the Internet for the client with the following single rule: >> >> accept

Any specific things to consider when setting up a "full feature" mailserver with OpenSMTPd at the base?

So great that OpenBSD is getting what seems to be its own SMTPd! I want to try it out!!! I imagine that it will work together with something like Courier-IMAP. SquirrelMail and Spamassassin. Any how-to's or specific things you need to know in that matter - or is it just plan and straight forward

Re: OpenSMTPd as a backup MX

Hi Gilles, > > Is your machine named "mx2.backdom.fr" ? > Your guess is perfectly right :) The machine is not named "mx2.backdom.fr". > > The configuration file and logs are very important to debug this, there > is so much we can guess :-p > I will send these in private. Thank you, Denis

Re: OpenSMTPD Problem

> when you use the local enqueuer with mutt, youe not connecting from > 127.0.0.1 but you're using a unix socket, your ruleset says that it > will only accept to relay from IP addresses listed in your > /etc/mail/relay file, therefore the local enqueuer is rejected. > Thanks, for your help, that

Re: OpenSMTPD Problem

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 07:22:28AM -0600, Nicholas Janzen wrote: > > can you show your configuration file please ? > > Certainly: > > [...] > > /etc/mail/relay > 127.0.0.1 > > [...] > when you use the local enqueuer with mutt, youe not connecting from 127.0.0.1 but you're using a unix socket, y

Re: Meaning of "from local"

Actually, from local means 2 things: 1- from _any_ IP address that is assigned to the local machine 2- from clients that have authenticated themselves to the local machine Gilles On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 05:45:43AM -0700, Barbier, Jason wrote: > From local means 2 things 1. From 127.0.0.0/8 or fr

Re: OpenSMTPD Problem

> can you show your configuration file please ? Certainly: /etc/mail/smtpd.conf pki testweb.secure5.net certificate "/etc/ssl/testweb.secure5.net.crt" pki testweb.secure5.net key "/etc/ssl/private/testweb.secure5.net.key" listen on all tls smtps secure pki testweb.secure5.net auth-optional tab

Re: Meaning of "from local"

>From local means 2 things 1. From 127.0.0.0/8 or from authenticated, On May 30, 2014 5:09 AM, "Clint Pachl" wrote: > Clint Pachl wrote, On 05/30/14 05:02: > >> The directive for "from local" in the smtpd.conf(5) man page states: >> >> "The rule matches only locally originating connections." >>

Re: Meaning of "from local"

Clint Pachl wrote, On 05/30/14 05:02: The directive for "from local" in the smtpd.conf(5) man page states: "The rule matches only locally originating connections." But what exactly does "locally originating" mean? My network consists of two subnets: 10.0.9.0/24 and 10.0.10.0/24. The OpenSMT

Meaning of "from local"

The directive for "from local" in the smtpd.conf(5) man page states: "The rule matches only locally originating connections." But what exactly does "locally originating" mean? My network consists of two subnets: 10.0.9.0/24 and 10.0.10.0/24. The OpenSMTPD server is at 10.0.9.20. The email cl

Re: using SPF or DKIM instead of greylisting?

> On Fri, 30 May 2014 11:45:13 +0200, Ji=C5=99=C3=AD Navr=C3=A1til atil.cz> > wrote: > > > V 30. kv=C4=9Btna 2014 at 11:38:43, Gilles Chehade (gil...@poolp.org) > > naps=C3=A1no: > > > What is your anti SPAM strategy please? Are available SPF and DKIM > > > configurations examples for OpenSMTPD?=C

Re: using SPF or DKIM instead of greylisting?

On Fri, 30 May 2014 11:45:13 +0200, Jiří Navrátil wrote: > V 30. května 2014 at 11:38:43, Gilles Chehade (gil...@poolp.org) > napsáno: > > What is your anti SPAM strategy please? Are available SPF and DKIM > > configurations examples for OpenSMTPD?  > >  > > Thak you for your recommendations.  >

Re: using SPF or DKIM instead of greylisting?

V 30. května 2014 at 11:38:43, Gilles Chehade (gil...@poolp.org) napsáno: > What is your anti SPAM strategy please? Are available SPF and DKIM > configurations examples for OpenSMTPD?  >  > Thak you for your recommendations.  >  I only use greylisting and fopr big hosts like gmail and yahoo, I ha

Re: using SPF or DKIM instead of greylisting?

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:26:18AM +0200, Ji Navr??til wrote: > Hello, > > I???m using pf greylisting on OpenBSD. More and more emails from Google are > delayed and few are not delivered at all. > > This https://support.google.com/mail/answer/180063 Google article suggest to > replace greyl

using SPF or DKIM instead of greylisting?

Hello, I’m using pf greylisting on OpenBSD. More and more emails from Google are delayed and few are not delivered at all. This https://support.google.com/mail/answer/180063 Google article suggest to replace greylisting with SPF or DKIM. What is your anti SPAM strategy please? Are available SP