Hi Chris,
On 24/05/2020 21:46, Christian Baer wrote:
I want to move the full fledged server
That server is known as the 'primary mail exchanger' (primary MX).
to the machine in my basement
You'll need a static IP address from your home ISP, and be able to set
the reverse DNS to match the
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:41:19 +0100 "Peter J. Philipp" wrote:
> I got another "bouncing messages from misc@opensmtpd.org" message. The
> particular message was 4669 that bounced. Yet I have no record of this in
> my maillog,...
Same here.
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
G'day Jeff,
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:48:41 -0500 Jeff Moskow wrote:
> (host foo.bar.com[192.168.2.2] said: 421 try again later (in reply to end of
> DATA command))
The primary MX OpenBSD machine is running spamd.
http://man.OpenBSD.Org/spamd
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
rite it when users are added/removed):
joe@public.domain -> joe@imap1.private
sarah@public.domain -> sarah@imap2.private
andy@public.domain -> andy@imap3.private
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
T
Thomas, you're a stupid, standards breaking, sack of shit.
STOP EMAILING ME PRIVATELY YOUR FUCKWIT CRAP!!!
MX records have a purpose. Read what they are for.
STOP SENDING ME YOUR FUCKWIT PRIVATE IDEAS ABOUT MX RECORDS
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 13:06:03 Craig Skinner wrote:
> On Wed
dinburgh airport is receiving traffic. Then then you
get the next flight to your final destination & Hogmanay for 3 days.
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
failure on Friday evening, and you can't
order parts until Monday, which take a week to arrive
Some shit takes more than 4 days to fix.
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a
are down, then relay over SMTP when
the primary can recieve the spooled mail.
> ... A solution is to use dot-lock files ...
Maildirs solve the hideous problems of mboxes... whether on NFS or not.
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
--
You received this mail because you are subs
a DNS zone.
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
their disks to govts.
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
ther domains, e.g:
$ dig lampero.ro TXT +short
"v=spf1 include:_spf.%{d} ~all"
$ dig _spf.lampero.ro TXT +short
"v=spf1 +a:mail.lampero.ro ~all"
$ dig dotbit.ro TXT +short
"v=spf1 include:_spf.lampero.ro ~all"
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/
telisting domains.
See: http://web.Britvault.Co.UK/products/ungrey-robins/
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
l user agent (MUA) authenticated mail submission port.
25 is for MTA to MTA duties, not for user authentication.
Regards,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
/HowTo/CRAM-MD5
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Mechanisms
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Mechanisms/DigestMD5
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/PasswordSchemes
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/ConvertPasswordSchemes
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner
er, do something like this & watch the logs:
user$ print delete | mail -s test matt.schwart...@gmail.com
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 10:22:28 Nick Gyurov wrote:
> ... autoconfiguration worked when listening on submission
Fuck me!
_WHAT_A_BIG_SURPRISE_!!!
Bloody hell!
Perhaps Firefox will start browsing on port 80 next! Whoop!!!
Maybe ssh will one day connect to port 22 too!
Stunned!
--
Craig Skin
hat non-standard
port, it would work too - but you are using a non-RFC port and hard
coding it Hey, why not use port 22? Hmmm I wonder...
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail t
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 12:51:55 +0300 Reio Remma wrote:
> Curious indeed, if Apple autoconfiguration would work properly on the
> submission port.
>
Yes Reio:-
> >> On 10 Apr 2018, at 5:43 PM, Craig Skinner wrote:
> >>
> >> Port 465 is not RFC compliant.
>
to be operative?
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
.ress -Y
primary.mx.host.name -Y another.mx.host.name'
spamlogd_flags='-I -Y primary.mx.host.name -Y another.mx.host.name'
Consider ungrey-robins to cope with round-robin dumb fuck freemailers:
http://web.Britvault.Co.UK/products/ungrey-robins/
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.i
Hi Edgar,
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 15:23:06 -0500 Edgar wrote:
> Postfix logs on opensmtpd list. Seems like heresy to me.
The SMT _Protocol_ was created to inter-operate on various daemons.
Interaction with other daemons is simply the protocol of mail transfer.
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | h
Hi Gilles/all again,
With a bit of commentary below:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:41:04 +0100 Craig Skinner wrote:
>
> Transcript of session follows.
>
OpenSMTPd running on lists.OpenBSD.Org has a message to send,
and knows what size that message is.
lists: knock knock teak
&g
Hi,
From the SMTP session trace below,
OpenSMTPd should have QUIT quickly after reading the SIZE parameter:
Cheers.
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System
-
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:18:05 +0100 (BST)
From: Mail Delivery System
To: Postmaster
Subject: Postfix SMTP server: err
Hi Markus,
On Tue, 1 Aug 2017 18:01:38 +0200 Markus Rosjat wrote:
> Am 01.08.2017 um 16:48 schrieb Craig Skinner:
>
> > Thunderbird (& others) can use MD5 passwords with Dovecot too:
> > https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/CRAM-MD5
>
> I dont know if I go this way since
/wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/CRAM-MD5
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://twitter.com/Craig_Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
Hi,
On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 06:12:31 +0500 Sandro Cardelli spammed:
> Received: from rptf.pisem.net (221.176.221.70 [221.176.221.70])
> by mx1.poolp.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 780e
> for ;
> Sat, 29 Jul 2017 03:12:32 +0200 (CEST)
> From: "Sandro Cardelli"
> To: "misc"
> Subject: Re: have
On 2017-06-17 Sat 14:56 PM |, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>
> Examples in the most recent PF tutorial start at
> https://home.nuug.no/~peter/pftutorial/#44 and there is a oneliner that
> would be an easy starting point for adapting to your needs at the bottom
> of https://home.nuug.no/~peter/pftut
rections,
it is unlikely they've allocated you a static IP address.
(SMTP doesn't usually work very well at all on dynamic addresses.)
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
HELO,
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:22:53 +0200 K. Peter wrote:
> > Romildo wrote the address of malaqu...@gmail.com, not
> > malaqu...@smtp.gmail.com
>
> from the log it seems that the connection fails to smtp.gmail.org.
Why do you think that is a DNS problem?
smtp.gmail.com is his outbound SMTP A
Hello,
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:59:22 +0200 K. Peter wrote:
>
> It is maybe because smtp.qmail.com is a CNAME:
>
> $ dig smtp.gmail.com +short mx
> gmail-smtp-msa.l.google.com.
>
Is the recipient's address u...@smtp.gmail.com ???
Romildo wrote the address of malaqu...@gmail.com, not malaqu...
Hi Will,
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:04:40 -0700 William Sloan wrote:
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
> I have a long running email thread with some friends that
> yesterday when I attempted to reply to a message I got an error that
> the message could not be delivered because it was not RFC 2822
>
Hi Jeremy/all,
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:25:30 -0500 Jeremy Volkening wrote:
>
> The short of it is that to share the passwd file, either:
>
> 1. The file must be world-readable (not so good)
>
> 2. The opensmtpd and dovecot daemon users must share a primary group,
> or
>
> 3. The daemons mus
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 16:03:42 +0200 Christian Kellermann wrote:
> Using a blacklist in smtpd.conf and updating that list would spare you
> the troubles of touching the packet filter rules.
>
> Or am I missing something?
# spamdb -t -a ip.ad.dr.ess
--
You received this mail because you are subscr
Hi Jason,
On 2016-02-26 Fri 10:37 AM |, John Cox wrote:
>
> 1) Run spamd or equivalent on your MTA to cut down on the amount of
> spam you accept. The less you accept the less you forward.
Yes, greylisting kills over 97% of spam.
OpenBSD's spamd runs on a variety of BSDs.
There's a pile of gr
Hi Jason,
On 2016-02-18 Thu 20:28 PM |, Jason Tubnor wrote:
>
> Maybe even a script that I can run say every 3 hours, a bit of hackery, uniq
> and a makemap would get me by as well.
>
Export the recipients from SexChange & putty scp the list to your box.
Adapt these ideas to your situation:
h
Hi Michael,
On 2016-02-08 Mon 16:49 PM |, Michael Burk wrote:
>
> If I send a message to the server's CNAME, it goes into a loop which is
> eventually detected and shut down:
>
Try switching from DNS CNAMES to DNS A records:
RFC2181 has:
"10.3. MX and NS records
The domain name used as the v
On 2016-01-29 Fri 14:09 PM |, Edd Barrett wrote:
>
> Some mails I receive are being cut in two by either: opensmtpd, fdm or
> spamassassn. I have opensmtpd running on an OpenBSD-5.8 machine. fdm
> (invoked from cron) picks up mail from /var/mail/edd (an mbox) and
> passes it to spamassassin for sp
Hi Edd,
On 2016-01-29 Fri 14:09 PM |, Edd Barrett wrote:
>
> * Maybe there's a race in reading the /var/mail/edd mbox. (Should I
>even have fdm reading a mbox while smtpd maybe is writing
>to it?)
Compare OpenSMTPd's syslog mail delivery timestamps & your cronjob freq
maildirs are bett
: Craig Skinner
To: Martin de Wendt
Subject: Re: TLS verify
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
On 2015-11-27 Fri 13:32 PM |, Martin de Wendt wrote:
> incoming emails from any tls required
This isn't realistic.
Do you *ONLY* visit https websites?
Do you *ONLY* visit IPv6 websites?
T
On 2015-10-09 Fri 19:40 PM |, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> The report taught us a few things and helped us spot weak points that we
> will work on hardening to make sure. I'll summarize a bit,
MTAs could be the most complex daemon commonly deployed.
For a very small, part time team, this is a huge
On 2015-07-25 Sat 20:39 PM |, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
>
> Later I had this issue with e-mails from a different mailing list.
> Unfortunately those message are missing on gmane. I can reproduce this
> issue easily:
>
> - run OpenSMTPD, request mlm to resend the message ... broken
> - run Postfix,
On 2015-08-01 Sat 08:16 AM |, SSL wrote:
>
> 2) spamd (send mail to gmail but *** cannot recieve from gmail *)
> -
> black.pf
> -
>
> ...
>
> pass in on $ext_if proto tcp to any port submission
> table persist
> table persist
> pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from
On 2015-07-11 Sat 22:26 PM |, Eric Ripa wrote:
> Thanks for the response. I suspected that but given that the actual content
> in this case is confidential I was a bit hesitant.
>
> Heres the leading part of the [MSG] section. Can you see anything triggering
> this?
>
It might be a (UTF) form
MailChip debugged. Quality improvement of 600 million emails every day:
$ postconf | fgrep strict_
strict_7bit_headers = yes
strict_8bitmime = yes
strict_8bitmime_body = yes
strict_mailbox_ownership = yes
strict_mime_encoding_domain = yes
strict_rfc821_envelopes = yes
- Forwarded message -
On 2015-04-11 Sat 16:04 PM |, Joerg Jung wrote:
>
> From my understanding, the user connects on port 25 (using STARTTLS and
> SMTP AUTH), is blocked by spamd (451 temporarily greylisted for 25 min),
> but usually MUAs try again some seconds later...
Users connect to the submission port 587 via t
On 2015-02-09 Mon 13:19 PM |, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> My grandma, like a lot of non-technical people, just wants to send mail,
> she doesn't want to be trained, she wants to write a message and press a
> button and the message being sent. If it doesn't work that way, she will
> just not use mail
ead it without decrypting it.
Neither can Goatmail, Snotmail, NSA, govt agencies, etc.
Govts & businesses have access to freemail data.
Encrypting only one end of the transaction offers little privacy.
SSL tranmission is of little benefit, for the same reason.
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | Th
On 2015-02-08 Sun 10:56 AM |, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> 1- you need the queue to be encrypted.
> 2- you need mails delivered to the users to be encrypted.
The SENDER encrypts their message in their MUA, _before_ sending.
> 3- you need mails to be decrypted when a user retrieves them.
The recipi
48 matches
Mail list logo
