I'm not taking a stand on this in any manner I just found it quite
interesting and though you might as well




 It seems we see more and more abuse of citizens by law enforcements
officers across the country. People are being tortured and killed with
electric tasers and videos of abuse are being published almost on a daily
basis.


Over 300 Americans have died due to the actions of police across the country
using tasers as a method of pain compliance. Kids are being tasered.
Senior citizens are being tasered, Wheelchair bound people are being
tasered/

We protest and they attack with night sticks. They slam heads into the
ground and then charge the people with assault or resisiting arrest. They
arrest media without cause.


Where does it end? Are we supposed to lay down our rights and our lives to
the state? Is that what being a citizen of teh United States of America is
about? I say Hell NO! It's time we wake up and take the power back!

As citizens of the United States of America, we must understand that we are
the true rulers of our own lives and each of us holds sovereign rights over
our bodies and liberties. When police officers or government officials break
the law they no longer hold any authority what so ever. In the instant they
act outside the law and under color of authority or jurisdiction we have a
right and duty to resist with force.


Below are some very interesting court decisions and legal precedents in
which honorable judges and juries have found the right to resist with mortal
force is the right of all free citizens. You may want to pass this on to
other police departments in your area.


Police departments should be made of aware of these facts. Maybe this will
raise eyebrows instead of lethal tasers and nightstcks.





>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting
officer's life if necessary." Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise
was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad
Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: "Where the officer is killed in
the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest
that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the
transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it
does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might
be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that
no offense had been committed.
"

"An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without affidavit,
or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction, and one who is
being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the arresting officer
is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an
involuntary manslaughter." Housh v. People, 75 111. 491; reaffirmed and
quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v. Gleason, 32 Kan. 245;
Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v Rousseau, 241 P. 2d 447; State v.
Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621.


"When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to
be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and
if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant
is killed, he is justified." Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State,
74 Ind. 1.


"These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest,
who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of
unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who
unlawfully uses such force and violence." Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I;
Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.


"An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be
restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending
himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery." (State v.
Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).


"Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the
person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may
be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense." (State v. Mobley, 240
N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).


"One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he
may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is
not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even
though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance." (Adams v.
State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).


"Story affirmed the right of self-defense by persons held illegally. In his
own writings, he had admitted that 'a situation could arise in which the
checks-and-balances principle ceased to work and the various branches of
government concurred in a gross usurpation.' There would be no usual remedy
by changing the law or passing an amendment to the Constitution, should the
oppressed party be a minority. Story concluded, 'If there be any remedy at
all ... it is a remedy never provided for by human institutions.' That was
the 'ultimate right of all human beings in extreme cases to resist
oppression, and to apply force against ruinous injustice.'" (From Mutiny on
the Amistad by Howard Jones, Oxford University Press, 1987, an account of
the reading of the decision in the case by Justice Joseph Story of the
Supreme Court.

As for grounds for arrest: "The carrying of arms in a quiet, peaceable, and
orderly manner, concealed on or about the person, is not a breach of the
peace. Nor does such an act of itself, lead to a breach of the peace."
(Wharton's Criminal and Civil Procedure, 12th Ed., Vol.2: Judy v. Lashley, 5
W. Va. 628, 41 S.E.
197)



-- 
http://votetom4council.webs.com/

http://417-political-pundit.blogspot.com/

www.moliberty.org

"lite a fire for a man he'll be warm for a day, lite the man on fire and
he'll be warm the rest of his life".

Just because you do not take an interest in politics doesn't mean politics
won't take an interest in you!
-Pericles (430 B.C.)

In fact, there is a direct correlation between loyalty to one's spouse and
the "trustworthiness, sincerity, honesty and strength of leadership"
required to lead a nation.
~John Edwards~

"no cause is lost if there is but one fool to fight for it"
~Will Turner~
~Pirate's of the Caribbean @ World's End~

Save your property rights
www.mo-cpr.org

http://www.radiofreeliberty.com

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
This is a Free Speech forum. The owner of this list assumes no responsibility 
for the intellectual or emotional maturity of its members.  If you do not like 
what is being said here, filter it to trash, ignore it or leave.  If you leave, 
learn how to do this for yourself.  If you do not, you will be here forever.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to