[MIT-Scheme-devel] Generalising socket code

2012-05-03 Thread craven
Hello MIT/GNU Schemers! I've been looking for UDP support, but found that - while the actual functions would be the same - the microcode implements only TCP. Is there any reason *not* to change the microcode primitives so that they get two additional parameters (the domain and the type, see "man 2

Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Why does URL:ENCODE-STRING not encode & and ; etc.?

2012-05-03 Thread craven
On Wed, 2 May 2012 22:44:44 -0700, Chris Hanson wrote: > You're confused because URL:ENCODE-STRING has nothing to do with "url > encoding", which the encoding used for > application/x-www-form-urlencoded (and which itself has nothing to do > with URIs). > > As the code comment says, this is just

Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Patches for current Swank

2012-05-03 Thread Peter Feigl
On Wed, 2 May 2012 20:43:49 +, Taylor R Campbell wrote: >Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 09:28:31 +0200 >From: > >Yesterday I've tried to get current SLIME (2012-03-06 here) to work with >MIT/GNU Scheme, and fixed a few things. Find attached my patches. How >should I best prepare