Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] removal of top-level "TAGS" file

Chris Hanson writes: | Oops. I had generated my own TAGS file there and was | surprised when it tried to check it in. I should have | looked at the original contents. > | Go ahead and put it back. Done. ___ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list MIT-Scheme-de

Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] reduce-right

Chris Hanson writes: | Yes thanks. Done. ___ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list MIT-Scheme-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel

Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] removal of top-level "TAGS" file

Oops. I had generated my own TAGS file there and was surprised when it tried to check it in. I should have looked at the original contents. Go ahead and put it back. On Feb 26, 2016 8:50 AM, "Arthur A. Gleckler" wrote: > Hi, Chris. In change e0429c04, "TAGS shouldn't be in > commit," you remove

Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] reduce-right

Yes thanks. On Feb 26, 2016 8:55 AM, "Arthur A. Gleckler" wrote: > Hi, Chris. In change de2cb85c, "Put reduce-right back," you > restored the implementation of `reduce-left' (not > `reduce-right'). However, that change didn't restore the > documentation for `reduce-left', which was removed in >

[MIT-Scheme-devel] reduce-right

Hi, Chris. In change de2cb85c, "Put reduce-right back," you restored the implementation of `reduce-left' (not `reduce-right'). However, that change didn't restore the documentation for `reduce-left', which was removed in 5410eb4b. Shall I restore that, too?

[MIT-Scheme-devel] removal of top-level "TAGS" file

Hi, Chris. In change e0429c04, "TAGS shouldn't be in commit," you removed the top-level "TAGS" file. Unlike other "TAGS" files, that file was not a generated file. Having it made it possible to do tags searches across the whole source code tree at once, not just one directory at a time. May I pl