Should be fixed now. On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 1:17 PM Chris Hanson <c...@chris-hanson.org> wrote:
> Looks like the hack I put into the printer was a mistake. > I'll fix it. > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 5:54 PM Matt Birkholz <m...@birchwood-abbey.net> > wrote: > >> I'm having fun with string slices except that they look like this: >> >> #[%record 42] >> >> The easiest way I've found to make them look like strings is this: >> >> (define-print-method %record? #f) >> >> That is probably not the right thing, but I'm hopeful most of the things >> I want to see are not unhandled %record?s. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list >> MIT-Scheme-devel@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel >> >
_______________________________________________ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list MIT-Scheme-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
