Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Patches for current Swank

2012-07-10 Thread Taylor R Campbell
Thanks for the patches -- I finally merged them today. There are a few little issues which it would be nice to fix. First, can you try to keep the code under 80 columns wide? From: Peter Feigl Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 09:31:24 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/6] Add autodoc for procedures ...

Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Patches for current Swank

2012-05-03 Thread Peter Feigl
On Wed, 2 May 2012 20:43:49 +, Taylor R Campbell wrote: >Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 09:28:31 +0200 >From: > >Yesterday I've tried to get current SLIME (2012-03-06 here) to work with >MIT/GNU Scheme, and fixed a few things. Find attached my patches. How >should I best prepare

Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Patches for current Swank

2012-05-02 Thread Taylor R Campbell
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 09:28:31 +0200 From: Yesterday I've tried to get current SLIME (2012-03-06 here) to work with MIT/GNU Scheme, and fixed a few things. Find attached my patches. How should I best prepare them so they get a chance at getting accepted into GIT? It looks like

[MIT-Scheme-devel] Patches for current Swank

2012-05-02 Thread craven
Hello fellow Schemers! Yesterday I've tried to get current SLIME (2012-03-06 here) to work with MIT/GNU Scheme, and fixed a few things. Find attached my patches. How should I best prepare them so they get a chance at getting accepted into GIT? Greetings, Peter From 203f5ab2624f366b41b0dcd144f1fa