Hi Developers,
I think we should carefully consider risks and chances for the cover art
support merge.
My impression is that the branch has a good overall quality and is a real
benefit for a upcoming 1.12 version.
What are the points of risks, that makes this different to other pull
requests.
He
That model has not worked well in the past. It doesn't matter how many
warnings there are, people will see "album art!", turn it on, and then
get angry if/when it crashes.
The new model I'd like to propose is:
* Enable an unstable-but-desirable feature (like cover art) by default
in development a
Definitely not "2.0+", just 2.0. But we also have an App Store
Exception in our license, so it's not even straight GPL-2.0. I'm not
sure what the official term for it is.
How big should the screenshot be?
On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 10:00 +0300, Tuukka Pasanen wrote:
> Hello,
> Bug #1262882 and Bug #
Hello,
Bug #1262882 and Bug #1334301 are about Gnome AppStream and Gnome
software center. I could do them and keep them up dated but then I
need good snapshot from someone who have 16:9 aspect ration and firmly
new Gnome installed (with cool bg image [so how 90' is that?]).
More about details with
