Re: [Mixxx-devel] Is --controllerDebug broken in master?

2017-01-23 Thread Be
--debugLevel 2 works. And yes, it shouldn't be needed if --controllerDebug is explicitly specified. On 01/23/2017 12:59 PM, RJ Ryan wrote: > I think you also need --debugLevel 4 now. We should make controller > debug statements bypass the debugLevel. > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:53 AM Ferran Pu

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Is --controllerDebug broken in master?

2017-01-23 Thread Ferran Pujol Camins
2017-01-23 19:59 GMT+01:00 RJ Ryan : > --debugLevel 4 Yes, this solves the issue. Thanks :) -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot_

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Is --controllerDebug broken in master?

2017-01-23 Thread RJ Ryan
I think you also need --debugLevel 4 now. We should make controller debug statements bypass the debugLevel. On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:53 AM Ferran Pujol Camins < ferranpujolcam...@gmail.com> wrote: > I can see incoming midi messages from activated controllers in Mixxx 2.0.0 > by passing the opti

[Mixxx-devel] Is --controllerDebug broken in master?

2017-01-23 Thread Ferran Pujol Camins
I can see incoming midi messages from activated controllers in Mixxx 2.0.0 by passing the option --controllerDebug. This does not happen in master. Is this a bug or there's something I'm not aware of? -- Check out the vibr