Re: [Mixxx-devel] [mixxx] Introduce static get and set functions for ControlObject (#28)

2013-06-29 Thread Daniel Schürmann
Hi Owen, just read the boost.optional doc. And it is relay a nice concept. Currently we have no boost dependencies in Mixxx, so one question is: Should we use boost. IMHO there is no strong demand, because Qt itself implements the most important functions from Boost and if we step up to c++11

Re: [Mixxx-devel] [mixxx] Introduce static get and set functions for ControlObject (#28)

2013-06-28 Thread Owen Williams
What's the current thinking about using boost::optional for this sort of thing? On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 14:00 -0700, RJ Ryan wrote: LGTM -- it may be useful to provide a default value or a bool* that is set if the control existed or not but whoever needs that first can add it. — Reply to