Hi!
> From: Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Playback is no problem with the record (write once) media - even my
> > couple year old portable DVD player accepts DVD+R discs without any...
>
> So, basically you're saying that there's a good chance a player will
> support the "other" f
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 08:48, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
>
> Playback is no problem with the record (write once) media - even my
> couple year old portable DVD player accepts DVD+R discs without any
> problems at all. The newer DVD player (the Philips unit mentioned
> earlie
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 08:38, Bernhard Praschinger wrote:
>
> The lower the quality factor better, but mpeg2enc needs bandwith to
> create good quality. If you don't have that bandwith it is better to
> request a lower quality.
That's good to know. I sort of expected that, but it's good to get it
Hello -
From: Selva Nair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It's a limitation of the CD drive - if it's a 2X rated drive then
> it can only go up to about 2500kb/s or so.
> From what I have seen on philips 623 player I dont think it's simply
> the drive capability. See my previous post. Could you
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Matti Haveri wrote:
> Selva Nair:
>
> > Well, if you are targetting a particular player it makes sense to use
> > the maximum supported bit rate. My Pioneer HTD510 is quite linient when
> > it comes to VCD/SVCD playback (it even plays 720x480 or 720x576 mpegs
> > burned
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > From: Matti Haveri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > My Pioneer 444 PAL DVD player plays (X)SVCDs at 480x576, 352x576,
> > 720x576 and even a VCD-like 352x288 MPEG2 with both 44.1 and 48 kHz
> > audio from about 1455-2500 kb/s.
> >
> > But
Hi -
> From: Matti Haveri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> 352x288 is a valid MPEG1 PAL DVD resolution but is it also OK for
> MPEG2 PAL DVD? Can I rip, unmux and burn a 352x288 XSVCD to a DVD?
>
> My Pioneer 444 PAL DVD player plays (X)SVCDs at 480x576, 352x576,
> 720x576 and even a VCD-like 352x288 M
Hi!
> From: Matti Haveri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> My Pioneer 444 PAL DVD player plays (X)SVCDs at 480x576, 352x576,
> 720x576 and even a VCD-like 352x288 MPEG2 with both 44.1 and 48 kHz
> audio from about 1455-2500 kb/s.
>
> But if I go above 2500 kb/s the playback always stutters no matter
>
Selva Nair:
Well, if you are targetting a particular player it makes sense to use
the maximum supported bit rate. My Pioneer HTD510 is quite linient when
it comes to VCD/SVCD playback (it even plays 720x480 or 720x576 mpegs
burned as an SVCD), but it can't handle more than 3000kb/s muxed rat
352x288 is a valid MPEG1 PAL DVD resolution but is it also OK for
MPEG2 PAL DVD? Can I rip, unmux and burn a 352x288 XSVCD to a DVD?
My Pioneer 444 PAL DVD player plays (X)SVCDs at 480x576, 352x576,
720x576 and even a VCD-like 352x288 MPEG2 with both 44.1 and 48 kHz
audio.
352x288 XSVCD is my
Hi,
I tried out some variations of dvd quality mpeg streams burned on a
CD-R data track using a philips 623 player. As I wrote last time,
with mpeg audio both video and audio plays well (audio channel has to be
manually selected as C0).
With AC3 I have less success:
(i) muxed using mplex on
Hi Robert,
Thank you for your reply. Very helpful info in it.
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Robert Kesterson wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Javier Hernandez wrote:
> > I got some DV raw material [Analog Camera --> Canopus Box --> Firewire]
> > with kino (I know it can be done also with dvgrab).
> > I did r
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 11:36, Jason Radford wrote:
> > I use the awesome RedRat2 IR Transmitter and perl glue to do the dirty
> > work. As I've recommended to many other on the list I recommend it to
> > you too. It works FLAWLESS for me. You can perform unbelievable acts of
> > complication using
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 10:47:16 -0800 (PST)
"Steven M. Schultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well I have a bttv card that for just recording tv shows like drew
> > carey is just fine, it's not outstanding quality but for watching once
> > and
>
> Are you capturing at full frame (640x480) fo
Hi Selva,
Thank you for your reply. All the information you have provided
me in this email is very valuable.
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Selva Nair wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Javier Hernandez wrote:
> > I got some DV raw material [Analog Camera --> Canopus Box --> Firewire]
> > with kino (I know it c
On 11 Dec 2002 11:18:12 -0800
Aaron Newsome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am archiving all my TV shows onto DVD. I figure if it is worth
> watching, it's worth keeping in high quality, with the exception of "The
> O'Reilly Factor" maybe. That is a watch once and delete show. This is
> why I ditch
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 10:52, Jason Radford wrote:
> > And you could do it without having to run your primary display through a
> > TV-Out.
>
> Ah I see...Or possibly put the video on VHS for someone without a
> DVD/computer then, right? What tools would I use under linux for a
> DV to analog ses
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 09:52, Jason Radford wrote:
> > Then too the 50 is unidirectional (analog -> DV) while the model
> > 100 can do both analog -> DV and DV -> analog.
>
> Ah I did not know thisAlthough (being new to this)What could
> be the reason for going from DV -> analog? j
Here's an article on slashdot to answer the
recently asked question.
http://slashdot.org/articles/02/12/11/0238200.shtml?tid=137
Hi Aaron and all other on the list,
Thank you very much to all of you for your replies.
On 10 Dec 2002, Aaron Newsome wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 02:45, Javier Hernandez wrote:
> > I did run that DV raw material with MPlayer in my computer:
> > - Audio is great aceptable.
> > - Video quality i
> And you could do it without having to run your primary display through a
> TV-Out.
Ah I see...Or possibly put the video on VHS for someone without a
DVD/computer then, right? What tools would I use under linux for a
DV to analog session?
-jason
--
Hi!
> From: Jason Radford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ah there was more difference when I looked I think, good that the
> 100 has came down..
I think it's more a matter of the 100 being discounted a little bit
and the 50 seems stuck at full list price.
> > Then too the 50 is unidir
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Bernhard Praschinger wrote:
>
> > > Then too the 50 is unidirectional (analog -> DV) while the model
> > > 100 can do both analog -> DV and DV -> analog.
> > Ah I did not know thisAlthough (being new to this)What could
> > be the reason for going from DV ->
Hallo
> > Then too the 50 is unidirectional (analog -> DV) while the model
> > 100 can do both analog -> DV and DV -> analog.
> Ah I did not know thisAlthough (being new to this)What could
> be the reason for going from DV -> analog? just wondering..
Maybe you wan't to watch a
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 06:36:15 -0500 (EST)
Robert Kesterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Absolutely. It took me a bit of work to get it going because my
> motherboard was faulty, but once I got a good motherboard in here, it was
> just plug and play. Works great. I love it. :-)
Wonderful.Th
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 20:01:14 -0800 (PST)
"Steven M. Schultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> $70 is about the size of the difference. The ADVC100 lists for
> $300 but you can find it for $270 online (I've ordered a couple of
> them from www.tristatecamera.com - good place in my
Hallo
> > > > Sometimes I find it useful to denoise the video by piping the
> > > > output of lav2yuv to yuvdenoise -l 1.
> > > Yes, good idea, i'll try that.
> > If you denoise, I hope you also use --interlace-mode|-I 0 because else
> > mpeg2enc will spend time for motion estimation for a interla
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Bernhard Praschinger wrote:
> Hallo
..
>
> > > Sometimes I find it useful to denoise the video by piping the
> > > output of lav2yuv to yuvdenoise -l 1.
> > Yes, good idea, i'll try that.
> If you denoise, I hope you also use --interlace-mode|-I 0 because else
> mpeg2enc wi
Hi -
> From: Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Yeah, so then there's the debate of DVD- over DVD+ formats. Which one to
> choose?
To me there was no debate - I went with the + format. It can handle
the RW media at ~2.4x vs the 1x of DVD-RW. 2x rated DVD-RW drives
Hallo
> > > [export_mpeg2enc.so] cmd=mpeg2enc -v 0 -q 3 -f 5 -4 2 -2 3 -b 2900 -F 4
> > > -n n -V 230 -o "casa".m2v -a 2
> > > [export_mp2enc.so] (44/4096) cmd=mp2enc -v 0 -r 44100 -b 128 -s -o
> > > "casa".mpa
> >
> > Bit rate of 2900 is out of specs for SVCD and may not play well on many
> > st
On 10 Dec 2002, Florin Andrei wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 08:00, Selva Nair wrote:
> >
> > On 8 Dec 2002, Florin Andrei wrote:
> > >
> > > [export_mpeg2enc.so] cmd=mpeg2enc -v 0 -q 3 -f 5 -4 2 -2 3 -b 2900 -F 4
> > > -n n -V 230 -o "casa".m2v -a 2
> > > [export_mp2enc.so] (44/4096) cmd=mp2e
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Jason Radford wrote:
> >
> > I noticed the model 50 on their website, I'm just wanting to play
> > with DV, do you have the 100 or 50 model? Just interested in the
> > differences, big price difference (if memory serves me right)..
> >
> I have the 100. The price difference
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Jason Radford wrote:
>
> I noticed the model 50 on their website, I'm just wanting to play
> with DV, do you have the 100 or 50 model? Just interested in the
> differences, big price difference (if memory serves me right)..
I have the 100. The price difference wasn't that mu
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 23:14, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
>
> In this case I do not believe the BMCs have much to do with it. Dual
> layer discs are manufactured by gluing two substrates together rather
> than recording thru the top layer. I do not see DVD9 "recorders"
I see now
34 matches
Mail list logo
