>> >> I'm trying to mplex together a video and an audio file, both produced by
transcode. I used dvd::rip to generate the transcode commands, but pasted
them onto the command line. Transcoding seems to have worked; I can view
>>the
>> >> video and it looks fine. The next command to exec
>From: Steven Boswell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Holy crap! I would have expected LML to actually care about
>high-quality drivers and providing support.
>
>I'll be getting a Canopus ADVC-100 very very soon. Thank you for the insights!
I've bought my ADVC-100s from www.tristatecamera.com (ye
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Steven Boswell wrote:
> >>Can you recall any of the nasty details of what made you dislike the
> >>card so much?
> >
> >My biggest problem with the LML33 was that Linux Media Labs had this
> >awesome card with killer specs on paper, it looked like exactly what I
> >needed to do
>>Can you recall any of the nasty details of what made you dislike the
>>card so much?
>
>My biggest problem with the LML33 was that Linux Media Labs had this
>awesome card with killer specs on paper, it looked like exactly what I
>needed to do DVD quality captures. Only problem is that they did n
Robert,
Thanks again for the Kino suggestion. I was having difficulty figuring
out how to use the FX options, and when looking at the help web page,
stumbled back to the Kino home page and found that a new version had
been released Monday, so I downloaded and compiled it, but I still can't
figure
Hi,
I am trying to make VCD and SVCD vith mpeg2end but I have a nasty
behaviour from my VCD player model SABA 100E (I have only this to make
tests):
With VCD (and SVCD) made from DVD ripping, the disk doesn't start
when I put it into the player, neither automatically nor pressing the
play button
Ronald, et al.,
> Add 'Load "v4l"' to the modules section of XF86Config-4 and restart X.
> Lots of people don't have that. ;-).
And I hadn't -- I was typically loading the necessary modules by hand
when I needed them. But I've added it in, and now all the bttv modules
are loaded right away -- bu
Hi Steven,
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 22:24, Steven Boswell wrote:
> It's the first 2 days I've been back, and I was catching up on e-mail.
> I have time to do that, but not to verify my changes are fully
> compliant with the GNU Coding Standards and solid enough to check into
> CVS. :-)
I don't thin
>> I told y'all I was moving! I should be responsive & so forth
>>in about a month! I'm sorry this happened right as I was becoming an
>>mjpegtools developer! It certainly wasn't planned that way!
>>
>>:-)
>
>(For a guy who is so busy moving, you've been pretty chatty over the
>last couple of d
On Friday 07 February 2003 21:10, Ronald Bultje wrote:
> Although even high-quality MJPEG has some annoying noise, I don't
> consider this much of a problem, the resulting MPEG never looks bad at
> all here (long live denoising)... MJPEG certainly isn't perfect, but can
> you really see the differe
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, davros wrote:
> >> I'm trying to mplex together a video and an audio file, both produced by
> >> transcode. I used dvd::rip to generate the transcode commands, but pasted
> >>them onto the command line. Transcoding seems to have worked; I can view the
> >> video and it looks
Hey Aaron,
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 19:56, Aaron Newsome wrote:
> Well the DV files might be bigger than MJPEG but the quality is no
> comparison in my mind. The DV files are of MUCH higher quality than the
> MJPEG files even at high MJPEG quality settings.
Although even high-quality MJPEG has some
Thx for the response. I tried many combinations of your suggestions, except
the f 3. I'm shooting for a disc that will play on my picky hardware player.
If I wanted just a high quality copy, I'd use divx...
In any case, I get the same error each time, regardless of the permutations.
Could the
Title: RE: [Mjpeg-users] LML33 vs. Canopus ADVC-100 (Subject Changed)
> My biggest problem with the LML33 was that Linux Media Labs had this
> awesome card with killer specs on paper, it looked like exactly what I
> needed to do DVD quality captures. Only problem is that they did not
> write a
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 05:28, John Ribera wrote:
> The ONLY advantage of a lml33 or DC10+ is the MJPEG files are smaller than
> DV, but with prices of disks comming down that becomes less of a issue.
Well the DV files might be bigger than MJPEG but the quality is no
comparison in my mind. The DV fi
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 16:32, Steven Boswell wrote:
> >>I'm planning to upgrade to either an LML-33 or a Canopus ADVC-100.
> >>[...]
> >>Does anyone here have experience with both styles of video capturing?
> >
> >I have used both LML33 and Canopus ADVC-100. If this is indication of
> >what I thoug
> I told y'all I was moving! I should be responsive & so forth
>in about a month! I'm sorry this happened right as I was becoming an
>mjpegtools developer! It certainly wasn't planned that way!
>
>:-)
(For a guy who is so busy moving, you've been pretty chatty over the
last couple of da
>>>I can send you the patch or a patched RPM or a patched yuv2lav or so
>>>if you want to, though.
>>
>>Yes, either of those options would be great. Would the patch be
>>against 1.6.2 or 1.6.1?
>
>1.6.1. You'll find it attached. It's by Steve Boswell (actually, he
>has CVS access to so he could
Hej folks !
I have some recorded 352x288 lying around on my harddisc, and I am
supposed to encode it for a colleague ... he wants to play it in Windows,
though, and I noticed that this can cause problems ...
Which settings (besides -f 1, standard VCD-MPEG) are proven to work in
Windows ? Maybe li
Hallo
> I'm trying to mplex together a video and an audio file, both produced by
> transcode. I used dvd::rip to generate the transcode commands, but pasted
> them onto the command line. Transcoding seems to have worked; I can view the
> video and it looks fine. The next command to execute is t
Hallo
> > I believe there should be software solution for this, thats if you are
> > trying to convert DV PAL to DV NTSC or you'll need two machines.
> > One machine playing DV PAL to ADVC100 and other receiving from
> > ADVC.
>
> I have an ADVC 100 but the user manual is so cheap that I am prob
IMO you should NEVER use SIGKILL to kill off processes. SIGTERM is a perfect
signal for this.
Allow processes to make a decision whether they should cleanup before
terminating, or in some cases - ignore the kill.
One of my pet peeves is for people to blindly use -9!
I tell my support people at t
I have purchaced 4 lml33's at $410 each. This was before the Canopus was
available for around $100. It's simple economics - you can get better
quality and stability (works on ALL chipsets) and portability (external unit
can be carried from computer to computer and works with Windows apps) with
thi
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 08:18:20AM +0100, Ronald Bultje wrote:
> Hi Brian,
Hi Ronald.
> it writes q\n, which quits lavplay nicely.
Right.
> After that, lavplay should be
> long gone when do_real_exit() is called.
Should be. But it might lag while it waits for disk i/o or something.
> If not,
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 06:01, Florin Andrei wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 11:37, Ronald Bultje wrote:
> >
> > Nvidia NForce? Didn't try any of those yet. Does anyone here have
> > experience with performance of this beast?
>
> I own a nForce1 motherboard, made by MSI Computer. It seems to have
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
