Re: [Mjpeg-users] Announce: some effect tools

2003-02-18 Thread Bernhard Praschinger
Hallo On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 07:04, Agent Smith wrote: man mjpegtools or man lavpipe. matteblend.flt is used w/ lavpipe similarly to transist.flt, but with 3 input streams. I think I have a new idea for a patch... :-) Well, feel free to write some lines of documentation about it...

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Flickering DVD output

2003-02-18 Thread Bernhard Praschinger
Hallo I'm trying to get a reasonable DVD/TV output, and I'm having flickering problems. I captured a PAL VHS source using a DC10+ and 1.6.1. My MJPEG file has these attributes: If you have VHS why dont you record at half size and the encode at have size ? That would speed up things, and you

[Mjpeg-users] CVS status

2003-02-18 Thread Derek Fountain
I've asked a couple of questions on the list over the last few days, and have been directed to features in CVS, which aren't in the stable 1.6.1 which I'm using. So, how stable is CVS these days? Heavy development, or ready for regular users to start beta testing? -- Eagles may soar, but

Re: [Mjpeg-users] CVS status

2003-02-18 Thread Robert Kesterson
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Derek Fountain wrote: I've asked a couple of questions on the list over the last few days, and have been directed to features in CVS, which aren't in the stable 1.6.1 which I'm using. So, how stable is CVS these days? Heavy development, or ready for regular users to

[Mjpeg-users] OT: MythTV.org

2003-02-18 Thread John Ribera
Anyone look at mythtv.org for PVR? Looks really great, but if you have a non-v4l, ie, zoran based, card it's unusable (since it hinges on software encoding). Same for DV. I suppose this is realted to inablility to playback realtime while capturing even though theoretically output to a card

Re: [Mjpeg-users] OT: MythTV.org

2003-02-18 Thread Ronald Bultje
Hey John, On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 16:06, John Ribera wrote: Looks really great, but if you have a non-v4l, ie, zoran based, card The zoran driver is fully v4l compliant. Capturing using video4linux' API is also supported (raw capture). You just need to do some kernel memory tweaking since the

Re: [Mjpeg-users] OT: MythTV.org

2003-02-18 Thread Allen J. Newton
Hi, John Ribera, you wrote: Subject: Re: [Mjpeg-users] OT: MythTV.org Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 11:46:39 -0500 I can only comment on one thing: I was thinking in terms of recording with DV OR zoran and playing back *WHILE* recording. Requirements (beyond what you specified): I For Zoran

Re: [Mjpeg-users] OT: MythTV.org

2003-02-18 Thread Alexandre CONRAD
I For Zoran (rec) + Zoran for (play) The zoran driver is fully v4l compliant. Capturing using video4linux' memory tweaking since the zr360x7 can't handle non-contiguous (paged) play fine with the zoran driver/cards. I'm seeing you guys talking about zoran. Is this the Optibase Videoplex

Re: [Mjpeg-users] OT: MythTV.org

2003-02-18 Thread Ronald Bultje
Hi Alexandre, On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 18:18, Alexandre CONRAD wrote: I'm seeing you guys talking about zoran. Is this the Optibase Videoplex Xpress ? No, it's the zr36057/zr36067 chipset, which is used on DC10+/Buz/LML33/etc. cards (hardware MJPEG codec boards). Ronald -- Ronald Bultje

Re: [Mjpeg-users] OT: MythTV.org

2003-02-18 Thread Ronald Bultje
Hey John, On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 18:38, John Ribera wrote: Are you saying one process cannot play on one Zoran while recording on a different one? Oh, that's possible. Just not both on the same card. :-). Ronald -- Ronald Bultje [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Mplex fails (too many dropped frames), Sizzle/ffmpegX

2003-02-18 Thread Steven Boswell II
You may have the same problem, though8000 kbps video + 256 kbps audio 8192 kbps already, even without the extra space mplex needs. For all the fun that DVDs promise, I have to say, I've found that for most things I'm happy with VCDs. (Not even SVCDsjust normal old VCDs.) They take 3 hours