Hallo
> I'm rendering an animation that will eventually be displayed on a 16:9
> screen that has a resolution of 1024x768. In order for this to look
> right, it seems I need to render my animation in a different resolution
> (on the PC), and then scale it to 1024x768 so that it will display right
> Hmmm, 1024x768 is 4:3 so I'm a bit confused what is meant by
> "16:9 screen ... resolution of 1024x768"
Yes, it's a really wierd system. It's a computer monitor that runs at
1024x768, but the actual screen dimensions are 16:9, meaning that the
pixel aspect ratio is really screwy, es
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Jonathan Bartlett wrote:
> I'm rendering an animation that will eventually be displayed on a 16:9
> screen that has a resolution of 1024x768. In order for this to look
Hmmm, 1024x768 is 4:3 so I'm a bit confused what is meant by
"16:9 screen ... resolution of
I'm rendering an animation that will eventually be displayed on a 16:9
screen that has a resolution of 1024x768. In order for this to look
right, it seems I need to render my animation in a different resolution
(on the PC), and then scale it to 1024x768 so that it will display right
on a 16:9 scre
Hi,
> I was playing around with the new mpeg2enc. When encoding with -f 4, I
> received a peak rate of around 3 Mb/s while the avarage was far lower: 2
> Mb/s. The SVCD palyed fine on a standalone player. Nevertheless, isn't this
> result strange?
This sounds 100% right. For short bursts the de
Hi,
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 07.14, Bernhard Praschinger wrote:
> Hallo
>
> > > >INFO: [mplex] Average bit-rate : 9497200 bits/sec
> > > >INFO: [mplex] Peak bit-rate: 9019200 bits/sec
> > >
> > > Basically it is 'peak' number thats wrong (it tends to underestimate a
> > > little)
