Re: [Mjpeg-users] File size question

2007-01-06 Thread Martin Samuelsson
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 20:22:32 + Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the reply, Steven. http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=13226045 All hail Steven! (And the person(s) that put that support into avilib for him to find, of course.) /Sam -

Re: [Mjpeg-users] File size question

2007-01-06 Thread Anne Wilson
On Saturday 06 January 2007 19:14, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > > From: Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > and have recorded today for the first time since I installed it. To my > > surprise, recording with > 02d in the file name didn't cause the serially > > numbered 1.7GB split files that I'm

Re: [Mjpeg-users] File size question

2007-01-06 Thread Steven M. Schultz
> From: Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > and have recorded today for the first time since I installed it. To my > surprise, recording with > 02d in the file name didn't cause the serially > numbered 1.7GB split files that I'm used to... > > it no longer considered necessary to split the files

[Mjpeg-users] File size question

2007-01-06 Thread Anne Wilson
I'm curious. I'm now using mjpegtools-1.9.1-14_cvs20061009.fc6.at under FC6, and have recorded today for the first time since I installed it. To my surprise, recording with %02d in the file name didn't cause the serially numbered 1.7GB split files that I'm used to. Indeed, one file is 11.4GB.