Le Mon, 13 Oct 2003 20:43:36 -0400
Matto Marjanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait :
[...]
> > Is my calculation right ?
>
> Nope. :)
>
> The answer for your PAL CVD is 59/54 * 2/1 = 59/27. (i.e. 59:27)
>
> For an NTSC CVD it would be10/11 * 2/1 = 20/11. (i.e. 20:11)
>
> It's just the pl
Am Dienstag, 14. Oktober 2003 02:43 schrieb Matto Marjanovic:
> I'll add a note about the "square is not *really* square" issue to
> the mir.com page. And, a CVD preset is now on the TODO list.
>
Thanks a lot :)
Steffen
---
This SF.net email
> Is my calculation right ?
Nope. :)
The answer for your PAL CVD is 59/54 * 2/1 = 59/27. (i.e. 59:27)
For an NTSC CVD it would be10/11 * 2/1 = 20/11. (i.e. 20:11)
It's just the plain old PAL or NTSC pixel aspect ratio scaled by 2,
since the horizontal resolution is reduced by 1/2.
>
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Alexei Dets wrote:
> Are you sure? AFAIR you have a Philips DVD 724 (as I do) and AFAIR I saw in
> Internet that it will play _NTSC_ 16:9 SVCD without any problems (but not PAL
I thought about that after I replied to the mail item.
The problem was not 100%
Hi!
On Saturday 11 October 2003 13:20, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> Try it - it works fine. But 16:9 SVCDs have played correctly only
> with software players for me.
Are you sure? AFAIR you have a Philips DVD 724 (as I do) and AFAIR I saw in
Internet that it will play _NTSC_ 16:9 SVCD
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Maik Holtkamp wrote:
> I never noticed this cvd and just had a short introduction on
> dvdrhelp.com. Sound intressting. But I alreay produced some coasters
> trying to put svcd 16:9 in my hardwarebox.
>
> Do I have a chance that my hardware player will accept 16:9 cvd if
> a
Hi,
0n 03/10/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:39 Steven M. Schultz told me:
>
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Nicolas Boos wrote:
>
> > In fact, I want y4mscaler's SVCD like output for CVD.
> >
> > For example, try to convert a WIDE source, first with "-O preset=SVCD"
>
> Ah, that was the part I missed. I di
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> Am Samstag, 11. Oktober 2003 00:39 schrieb Steven M. Schultz:
> > Perhaps the author of y4mscaler, if asked nicely, would build in
> > a CVD preset... ;)
>
> /me is the second one who would want that (please :
It seems the y4msc
Am Samstag, 11. Oktober 2003 00:39 schrieb Steven M. Schultz:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Nicolas Boos wrote:
> > In fact, I want y4mscaler's SVCD like output for CVD.
> >
> > For example, try to convert a WIDE source, first with "-O
> > preset=SVCD"
>
> Ah, that was the part I missed. I didn't
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Nicolas Boos wrote:
> In fact, I want y4mscaler's SVCD like output for CVD.
>
> For example, try to convert a WIDE source, first with "-O preset=SVCD"
Ah, that was the part I missed. I didn't see mention of WIDE
(16:9) before.
Perhaps the author o
Le Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
"Steven M. Schultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait :
[...]
> > I've calculated myself and found 295/132 :
>
> Hmmm, why not let y4mscaler do the calculations? ;)
>
> Just specify "-O size=352x576" and it will do the right thing
> automati
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Nicolas Boos wrote:
> I'm wondering what is the pixel aspect ratio value for 1/2 D1 (CVD)
> resolution. This is for use with y4mscaler.
>
> I've calculated myself and found 295/132 :
Hmmm, why not let y4mscaler do the calculations? ;)
Just specify "-O size=
Hello,
I'm wondering what is the pixel aspect ratio value for 1/2 D1 (CVD)
resolution. This is for use with y4mscaler.
I've calculated myself and found 295/132 :
(59/54)*(720/576)*(576/352) = 295/132
(source is http://www.mir.com/DMG/aspect.html)
But, also found a pixel aspect ratio value o
13 matches
Mail list logo
