On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 06:11:24PM +0200, Bernhard Praschinger wrote:
> Hallo
>
> When you have only 2MHz of bandwith, you cannot have a chessboard
> of white/black pixles and in each row 360 white annd 360 Black
> pixles for PAL. The voltage level has to raise and fall. And with
> 2MHZ of bandwit
Hallo
> > > If you're in a 625line (usually "PAL") video country then VHS has
> > > 576 active (vertical) lines in 2 fields just like TV and DVDs.
> > >
> > > VHS does lack resolution though since it effectively only has 200
> > > or so horizontal lines.
> > I still have not found any reliable res
Hi Steven & all,
On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 17:27, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > You're comparing two different things, so it's not as easy as "is 2
> > smaller than 1"? VHS is interlaced, but only at half of the lines as
> > your actual TV/cable display, i
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 04:56:04PM +0200, Bernhard Praschinger wrote:
> Hallo
>
> > If you're in a 625line (usually "PAL") video country then VHS has
> > 576 active (vertical) lines in 2 fields just like TV and DVDs.
> >
> > VHS does lack resolution though since it effectively only has 200
> > or
Hallo
> If you're in a 625line (usually "PAL") video country then VHS has
> 576 active (vertical) lines in 2 fields just like TV and DVDs.
>
> VHS does lack resolution though since it effectively only has 200 or
> so horizontal lines.
I still have not found any re
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:39:12 +0800
Derek Fountain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The HOWTO says that "-d 2 is already better than VHS video (a
> *lot*!)." Does that mean that if I'm capturing from a VHS source I
> will gain nothing from using -d 1, and should always use -d 2? Or
> does it mean that
Hi Ronald -
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> You're comparing two different things, so it's not as easy as "is 2
> smaller than 1"? VHS is interlaced, but only at half of the lines as
> your actual TV/cable display, if I'm correct.
Oops - I think you're confusing "VCD" with
Hi Derek,
On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 07:39, Derek Fountain wrote:
> The HOWTO says that "-d 2 is already better than VHS video (a *lot*!)." Does
> that mean that if I'm capturing from a VHS source I will gain nothing from
> using -d 1, and should always use -d 2? Or does it mean that given a
> theor
The HOWTO says that "-d 2 is already better than VHS video (a *lot*!)." Does
that mean that if I'm capturing from a VHS source I will gain nothing from
using -d 1, and should always use -d 2? Or does it mean that given a
theoretically perfect source, capturing with -d2 and then playing back woul
