On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 23:30, Andrew Stevens wrote:
> On Monday 24 November 2003 06:06, Florin Andrei wrote:
> > mplex -f 8 -S 150 -O 500 ${proj}.m2v ${proj}.ac3 -o 1.vob
> > mplex -f 8 -S 150 -O -500 ${proj}.m2v ${proj}.ac3 -o 2.vob
> > Then i compare the sync info on the two VOBs like this:
> ...
On Monday 24 November 2003 06:06, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Can someone explain to me how's mplex -O supposed to work?
>
> I'm using the current (sunday nov 23, in the evening) mjpegtools CVS
> tree.
>
> I'm doing this:
>
> mplex -f 8 -S 150 -O 500 ${proj}.m2v ${proj}.ac3 -o 1.vob
>
> mplex -f 8 -S 15
Can someone explain to me how's mplex -O supposed to work?
I'm using the current (sunday nov 23, in the evening) mjpegtools CVS
tree.
I'm doing this:
mplex -f 8 -S 150 -O 500 ${proj}.m2v ${proj}.ac3 -o 1.vob
mplex -f 8 -S 150 -O -500 ${proj}.m2v ${proj}.ac3 -o 2.vob
Then i compare the sync inf
HI,
> So, the CVS should fix the issue, right?
Certainly -O it produces the expected result out-of-sync when I
playback using xine.
Andrew
---
This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC
GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 14:16, Andrew Stevens wrote:
> >However, neither xine nor mplayer show any differences in A/V sync when
> >playing these VOBs. It's like -O has no effect.
>
> Not all players actually use the PTS for their sync stuff. Some just more or
> less reconstruct it themselves 'on t
>However, neither xine nor mplayer show any differences in A/V sync when
>playing these VOBs. It's like -O has no effect.
Not all players actually use the PTS for their sync stuff. Some just more or
less reconstruct it themselves 'on the fly'. You should see a noticeable
result on hardware play
I'm using mjpegtools-1.6.1.90
Either i'm not interpreting the docs correctly, or -O does not work as
expected.
I multiplex a VOB without -O:
mplex -f 8 -S 500 stnem.m2v stnem.ac3 -o stnem2.vob
Then i mux another one, this time with -0:
mplex -f 8 -S 500 -O 500 stnem.m2v stnem.ac3 -o stnem.vob
