Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdenoise parameter handling bug as well

2003-03-11 Thread Richard Ellis
--- Ronald Bultje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Richard, > > On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 14:13, Richard Ellis wrote: > > Note, w/h appear to be the result of subtracting two from unsigned > > int's that were initialized to zero, instead of being initialized to > > the incoming frame width/height from

Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdenoise parameter handling bug as well

2003-03-09 Thread Ronald Bultje
Hey Richard, On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 14:13, Richard Ellis wrote: > Note, w/h appear to be the result of subtracting two from unsigned int's > that were initialized to zero, instead of being initialized to the > incoming frame width/height from the yuv4mpeg header. Yup, they're uint16_t's (see yuvde

[Mjpeg-users] yuvdenoise parameter handling bug as well

2003-03-07 Thread Richard Ellis
While we are on the subject of parameter handling bugs in the yuv* tools, this one also exists: Call yuvdenoise with this parameter: -b 2,2,-2,-2 which according to the man page should do this: "Sometimes it may be usefull to have relative coordinates like this: yuvdenoise -b 16,16,-16,-16