On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Richard Ellis wrote:
> Attached is a small patch that I put together today that based on my
Ok - it's in there (the 255 vs 256 typo was taken care of ;))
Preferable are diffs against the current CVS though - especially
now that 1.6.1.90 no longer mat
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 08:13:47PM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Richard Ellis wrote:
>
> > Attached is a small patch that I put together today that based on my
> > measurements produces about a 6-7% speedup of yuvdenoise if the
> > luminance contrast option is used. I
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Richard Ellis wrote:
> Attached is a small patch that I put together today that based on my
> measurements produces about a 6-7% speedup of yuvdenoise if the
> luminance contrast option is used. I got the idea for the change
> from the yuvcorrect sources, the optimization is
Attached is a small patch that I put together today that based on my
measurements produces about a 6-7% speedup of yuvdenoise if the
luminance contrast option is used. I got the idea for the change
from the yuvcorrect sources, the optimization is to pre-compute the
contrasted values for pixel val