Version 1102 was commited by markb on 2009-07-24 09:06:03 +0100 (Fri, 24 Jul
2009)
Short arc removal was broken when --route was not specified, fixed.
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo
Hi Valentijn,
> I just ran mkgmap without --route:
Thanks, that's another buglet squished. I've committed a fix.
Incidentally, that way, Road Diemerdreef (OSM id 24975519), is a really
dumb bit of OSM. It's a roundabout with about 20 points and has a
diameter of about 1m! Why do people do that?
Hi there,
quite a lot of cycleways around here alongside major roads
(primary,secondary,trunk) are tagged as cycleway=track. In this case the
Garmin device does not use this ways if "Avoid Highways" is enabled in
routing option. The result is a very strange routing in these places.
Would it be po
Hi Sven,
> quite a lot of cycleways around here alongside major roads
> (primary,secondary,trunk) are tagged as cycleway=track. In this case the
> Garmin device does not use this ways if "Avoid Highways" is enabled in
> routing option. The result is a very strange routing in these places.
>
> Wo
Mark Burton schreef:
> Incidentally, that way, Road Diemerdreef (OSM id 24975519), is a really
> dumb bit of OSM. It's a roundabout with about 20 points and has a
> diameter of about 1m! Why do people do that?
I wouldn't know, I'm an IT person. My wife though is a psychologist. Do
you want me to f
As requested, here's an option (--make-cycleway-tracks) to enable the
synthesis of cycleways when a (non-cycleway) way is tagged
cycleway=track.
I have also tweaked the code for making opposite cycleways - it now
gives the synthesised way a highway=cycleway tag which it wasn't doing
before.
So a
Hi,
> > Incidentally, that way, Road Diemerdreef (OSM id 24975519), is a really
> > dumb bit of OSM. It's a roundabout with about 20 points and has a
> > diameter of about 1m! Why do people do that?
>
> I wouldn't know, I'm an IT person. My wife though is a psychologist. Do
> you want me to file
Mark Burton escribió:
> Hi Valentijn,
>
>
>> I just ran mkgmap without --route:
>>
>
> Thanks, that's another buglet squished. I've committed a fix.
>
> Incidentally, that way, Road Diemerdreef (OSM id 24975519), is a really
> dumb bit of OSM. It's a roundabout with about 20 points and has
Mark Burton schreef:
> BTW, do you have mini roundabouts?
Yes, we do...
> If so, should it have been one of them?
... but no.
It's large. It was probably added at wrong scale or something - I looked
at the history of the thing but there's not much there.
V.
Mark Burton wrote:
> As requested, here's an option (--make-cycleway-tracks) to enable the
> synthesis of cycleways when a (non-cycleway) way is tagged
> cycleway=track.
Wow, that was fast!
Anyway looking at the patch this seems to be incomplete. We should
synthesise a cycleway for the followin
Hi Sven,
> Anyway looking at the patch this seems to be incomplete. We should
> synthesise a cycleway for the following tags:
> track,left,rigt,lane and yes.
>
> Where left or right will imply oneway=yes.
I have no problem with matching more tags. However, left, right and yes
are not discussed
Mark Burton wrote:
> I have no problem with matching more tags. However, left, right and yes
> are not discussed on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
> how are they meant to be used?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Advanced_footway_and_cycleway
left and right
Sven Geggus schreef:
> You replaced cycleWay.copyTags with new code, this way you end e.g. up with
> something like this:
>
> highway=cycleway
> (+ more tags)
>
> instead of:
>
> highway=residential
> (+ more tags)
>
> However, this may lead to a situation, where cycling one-way roads into t
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:56:19 + (UTC)
Sven Geggus wrote:
> Mark Burton wrote:
>
> > I have no problem with matching more tags. However, left, right and yes
> > are not discussed on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
> > how are they meant to be used?
>
> http://wiki.openstreetm
Valentijn Sessink wrote:
> So you mean: if a certain way has
> "highway=$something; oneway=yes; cycleway = opposite"
> mkgmap should ADD a fake road that has
> "highway=$something, oneway=-1" and then access restrictions for pretty
> much everything except bikes, is that what you're saying?
Exac
v2 - Now matches extra tags (lane, left, right, both).
Commented out setting of highway=cycleway until it's agreed that it's a
good idea.
-
As requested, here's an option (--make-cycleway-tracks) to enable the
synthesis of cycleways when a (non-cycleway) way is tagged
cyclew
Here's a question: when you have a cycleway lane/track, are bicycles
prohibited from using the road or can they use the road if they wish to?
I wonder if when we generate a cycleway, we should be adding a
bicycle=no to the original way?
Cheers,
Mark
_
Mark Burton wrote:
> Here's a question: when you have a cycleway lane/track, are bicycles
> prohibited from using the road or can they use the road if they wish to?
I suppose that this is different in different countries. In Germany
there is a term called "Radwegebenutzungspflicht" which means t
Hi Sven,
> Mark Burton wrote:
>
> > Here's a question: when you have a cycleway lane/track, are bicycles
> > prohibited from using the road or can they use the road if they wish to?
>
> I suppose that this is different in different countries. In Germany
> there is a term called "Radwegebenutzu
Mark Burton wrote:
> so that if the original way doesn't already have the bicycle routing
> defined, it will be disallowed.
Ah, nice!
There is another thing I found looking at the code.
As far as left and right tags are concerned one should create a
one-way cycleway only.
right: cycleway with
Thilo Hannemann schrieb:
> Here is another approach to the "lost last point". The Douglas Peucker
> filter is improved so that it can deal with identical start- and
> endpoints. If the start- and the endpoint are identical, the algorithm
> calculates the distance between these identical points
Hi Johann,
it is actually not what it seems to be. The douglasPeucker function is
called recursively. If the condition (maxDistance < allowedError) is
fulfilled, the current part of the way can be reduced to a line (in
case start- and endpoint are different points) or a point (in case
star
v3
renamed option for enabling this to --make-cycleways
added --make-all-cycleways option to turn on all cycleway synthesising
options
Now removes bicycle access from the original way (unless that way has a
"bicycle" tag) to force the routing to use the cycleway.
BTW - this may be a complete r
Hi Sven,
> > so that if the original way doesn't already have the bicycle routing
> > defined, it will be disallowed.
>
> Ah, nice!
I have put out a new patch that does that.
> There is another thing I found looking at the code.
>
> As far as left and right tags are concerned one should creat
Hi,
While hacking on my own TYP file, I've noticed that my preferred
styling for highway=primary is never being respected, and that primary
roads always assume the same style as trunk. In the TYP file, I've
assumed that primary will be mapped to 0x03 [Principal HWY-medium] and
trunk to 0x02 [Princ
I've done some more README work. I am finding a lot of information on
wikis, including talk pages, and have tried to link to it rather than
duplicating it, at least for now.
This patch creates all the files, even if some of them have little
content. I did include an example of making gmapi-form
Mark Burton schreef:
> if(currentWay.getTag("bicycle") == null)
> currentWay.addTag("bicycle", "no");
>
> so that if the original way doesn't already have the bicycle routing
> defined, it will be disallowed.
In the Netherlands that would be right, too: the bicycle-paths are
mandatory. My f
27 matches
Mail list logo
