On 11/20/2010 05:50 PM, WanMil wrote:
>>> What about sub-sea tunnels or bridges over sea like Öresundbridge?
>>>
>>> So maybe it's better to exclude highways with bridge=yes or tunnel=yes.
>>>
>>> aighes
>> You are right. Bridges and tunnels are already excluded. So that should
>> be no problem.
>>
>>
>> What about sub-sea tunnels or bridges over sea like Öresundbridge?
>>
>> So maybe it's better to exclude highways with bridge=yes or tunnel=yes.
>>
>> aighes
>
> You are right. Bridges and tunnels are already excluded. So that should
> be no problem.
>
> WanMil
Mmmh, within the next days we
I am sorry. The promised patch is more complicated than I thought. The
POI generation source code has no access to original tags because it is
placed after the transformation from an OSM object to a garmin object.
It will take some time to change this. I won't do this before I finished
the revi
>
> What about sub-sea tunnels or bridges over sea like Öresundbridge?
>
> So maybe it's better to exclude highways with bridge=yes or tunnel=yes.
>
> aighes
You are right. Bridges and tunnels are already excluded. So that should
be no problem.
WanMil
I have observed that typically mkgmap does not use more that 2 threads.
If the max-jobs parameter is set to a greater value than 2 the surplus
threads are blocked in the MapMaker.loadFromFile.
There is a note in the MapMaker source code:
// work around non-reentrancy of GType pri
What about sub-sea tunnels or bridges over sea like Öresundbridge?
So maybe it's better to exclude highways with bridge=yes or tunnel=yes.
aighes
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Flood-blocker-tp5759051p5759058.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list
I have committed a first version of a flood blocker to the coast branch.
The blocker is quite simple and works only for multipolygon sea
generation. At the moment it removes sea polygons that contains one or
more highways.
Please give it a try and let me know about your experiences.
(Don't expe
Hi
I know, it wont help you, but I haven't nay problems with pbf-input and
modified area.list. I think the only think I do divernt is splitting the
europe-file with osmosis to the needed size.
aighes
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/error-splitting-binary-files-t