Re: [mkgmap-dev] compile issues with mkgmap-r1905

2011-03-30 Thread maning sambale
Hi, Continuing my quest on this issue, I tried compiling using the pbf format and everything was compiled without problems. The current bz2 file is 32 MB (400 MB uncompressed xml) the pbf is 20 MB. My suspicion is that the data is becoming too large to compile on my machine. One curious thing i

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Address search issues

2011-03-30 Thread Dermot McNally
It looks like we may not be out of the woods yet on this one - with the latest patch, trying to build a map of Ireland (from the Geofabrik extract) fails, where it had succeeded before. Single tile, no splitting: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 36 at uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.sr

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Splitter and .pbf

2011-03-30 Thread Henning Scholland
I think it's not the first time, that this question was ask. Maybe it would be better to have a short note in the download-file or at splitter downloadpage. Henning ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/ma

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Splitter and .pbf

2011-03-30 Thread Carlos Dávila
El 30/03/11 22:47, Steve Ratcliffe escribió: > Hi > > >> I've been using the old splitter prepared by Steve till now, because I >> didn't know about that merge. Now, after successfully compiling r170, I >> get the following error attempting to split a pbf file: >> Exception in thread "main" jav

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Splitter and .pbf

2011-03-30 Thread Steve Ratcliffe
Hi > I've been using the old splitter prepared by Steve till now, because I > didn't know about that merge. Now, after successfully compiling r170, I > get the following error attempting to split a pbf file: > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: > crosby/binary/file/BlockRea

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Style + TYP, next iteration

2011-03-30 Thread Marko Mäkelä
Hi Jeroen, On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 02:09:20PM +0100, Jeroen Muris wrote: >For who's interested, I uploaded a copy of the latest TYP file, for >family ID 1: >http://dl.dropbox.com/u/20232727/M001-JM-new_colours.TYP > >With the current default style not all element will show. Some >alterations

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Overview of OSM tagging vs effects on Garmin maps

2011-03-30 Thread Christian Hattemer
On 03/30/11 11:42, Colin Smale wrote: > Now there's a discussion taking place about revising the documentation > for the command line options, would it be an idea to start some > documentation of the way tags are used within the Java code? This would > assist anyone wanting to tweak the style sheet

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Splitter and .pbf

2011-03-30 Thread Carlos Dávila
El 30/03/11 20:23, Marko Mäkelä escribió: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Bob Hawkins wrote: > >> I was advised recently that I could use the much smaller .pbf file >> rather than .bz2 from Geofabrik, but that I had to use a particular >> splitter, in this case r161-3. >> > Th

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Splitter and .pbf

2011-03-30 Thread Marko Mäkelä
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Bob Hawkins wrote: >I was advised recently that I could use the much smaller .pbf file >rather than .bz2 from Geofabrik, but that I had to use a particular >splitter, in this case r161-3. There used to be a splitter crosby_integration (sp?) branch r161 t

Re: [mkgmap-dev] LOCATOR: doubt about "contains no name tag" messages

2011-03-30 Thread Carlos Dávila
El 24/03/11 19:18, WanMil escribió: Processing spain.osm.pbf from Geofabrik I get several "contains no name tag" messages that point to ways tagged in the form: admin_level=8 boundary=administrative It's true they don't have a tag name, but they belong to relations with >>>

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Splitter and .pbf

2011-03-30 Thread Henning Scholland
You also could use r170 and also all other version > 161 Henning ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Splitter and .pbf

2011-03-30 Thread Bartosz Fabianowski
The advice should probably have been to use 161 or newer. Once pbf support was added, I do not see why it would disappear again in a later version. I am using 170 and it has parsed any pbf I have thrown at it so far. - Bartosz ___ mkgmap-dev mailing l

[mkgmap-dev] Splitter and .pbf

2011-03-30 Thread Bob Hawkins
I was advised recently that I could use the much smaller .pbf file rather than .bz2 from Geofabrik, but that I had to use a particular splitter, in this case r161-3. This, I did. I wonder, though, how it is known what particular splitter version to use with, say, the next .pbf file I choose to

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Address search issues

2011-03-30 Thread Bartosz Fabianowski
Yes, your patch works! I just went through the test cases that used to break. All work now. I then rebuilt a map of all of Italy. Address search works in that map as well. It looks like the bug is fixed. Thanks a lot. - Bartosz ___ mkgmap-dev mailing

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Address search issues

2011-03-30 Thread Steve Ratcliffe
Hi Thanks for your work on this. I now believe that the shield code should not strongly affect the sort order, whereas before I thought they did. Could you try the attached patch please. ..Steve Index: src/uk/me/parabola/imgfmt/app/Label.java =

[mkgmap-dev] Overview of OSM tagging vs effects on Garmin maps

2011-03-30 Thread Colin Smale
Hi, I have been experimenting with mkgmap for a couple of months now. I am not really a Java programmer, but I can read and understand the code easily. Having been surprised by how certain map attributes come through on the Garmin using the standard stylesheets, I have been looking into how th