Hi,
I tried this to mark those areas in my map (found it on several pages):
In lines style: highway=pedestrian & area!=yes [0x0d level 2]
In polygons style: highway=pedestrian & area=yes [0x13 level 2]
Result is,that there is no marked area and the highway itself is not
drawn with type 0x0d b
The European boundaries compiled by WanMil are available for download:
http://www.navmaps.eu/wanmil/europe_bounds_20110429.zip
Johan
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 22:49:54 +0200, WanMil wrote:
> Great! That was a silly bug...
>
> I think I found another big issue that affects quite a lot of
> bound
I have the problem that some ways are missing in the osmosis filtered dump.
Here is my osmosis call:
osmosis.bat --rb europe.osm.pbf --tf accept-ways boundary=administrative
--tf accept-relations boundary=administrative --used-way --used-node
--wx europe-boundaries.osm.gz
One example what is
Great! That was a silly bug...
I think I found another big issue that affects quite a lot of
boundaries. My osmosis command line was not complete. Ways without
boundary=administrative were not contained in the output file. I think
for this the --used-way parameter must be added. It is new in os
It seems r1929 did the trick. Now I get 44 matches for "Calle Calvario"
(vs 46 with trunk), all of them but two with complete city, region,
country information. Also most of the States/Provinces are now correct.
El 28/04/11 23:23, Carlos Dávila escribió:
> El 28/04/11 21:49, WanMil escribió:
>>
> Hi Wanmil,
> I extracted bounds_240_20.bnd, found a lot of gpx files in
> admin_level=10, and searched for a 'problematic' relation r297049, which I
> found there:
> 10_r297049_o_0.gpx Opened it and nothing seems wrong with it. And yet there
> is not one street within this relation tha
Hi Wanmil,
I extracted bounds_240_20.bnd, found a lot of gpx files in
admin_level=10, and searched for a 'problematic' relation r297049, which I
found there:
10_r297049_o_0.gpx Opened it and nothing seems wrong with it. And yet there is
not one street within this relation that is matched
On 28/04/11 20:52, WanMil wrote:
>
>> With a boundsdirectory it went fine. I haven't paid attention to the
>> performance, with a few tiles it was ok I guess. I'll try to compile the
>> whole Benelux end of this week and compare the processing times.
>>
>> The osmosis step took a lot of time, I'm
I have committed a converter that converts one or more precompiled
boundary files to GPX files. This is necessary to answer the numerous
questions "Why is this street not mapped to town A" etc.
It is also very useful for the development.
How does it work?
Call
java -cp mkgmap.jar
uk.me.parabol
On 2011-04-29 14:37, Martin wrote:
> Has anybody already uploaded the file?
>
> Martin
>
An older (november 2010) coastline extract from the Planet dump is here:
http://planetosm.oxilion.nl/~lambertus/coastline.osm.gz
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-d
Has anybody already uploaded the file?
Martin
On 28.04.2011 21:52, WanMil wrote:
>> With a boundsdirectory it went fine. I haven't paid attention to the
>> performance, with a few tiles it was ok I guess. I'll try to compile the
>> whole Benelux end of this week and compare the processing times
11 matches
Mail list logo
