Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Diff for precompiled boundary tiles

2011-05-15 Thread WanMil
> I have committed a program that compiles a diff for the coverage of > boundaries in the boundary tiles. > > Start it with: > java -cp mkgmap.jar > uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.boundary.BoundaryDiff > > > The diff is created as a set of gpx files that shows removed areas > (contained in bound

[mkgmap-dev] [locator] Diff for precompiled boundary tiles

2011-05-15 Thread WanMil
I have committed a program that compiles a diff for the coverage of boundaries in the boundary tiles. Start it with: java -cp mkgmap.jar uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.boundary.BoundaryDiff The diff is created as a set of gpx files that shows removed areas (contained in boundsdir1 but not

[mkgmap-dev] [locator] Precompiled europe boundaries

2011-05-15 Thread WanMil
.. can be downloaded from http://www.navmaps.eu/wanmil/europe_bounds_20110515.zip The format has slightly changed so you need to use the latest jar file from the locator branch. WanMil ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://w

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Simplifying the check line in polygon

2011-05-15 Thread Jon Burgess
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 15:42 +0200, WanMil wrote: > Am 15.05.2011 15:10, schrieb Jon Burgess: > > On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 14:31 +0200, WanMil wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I am thinking about how to reduce the processing time of the locator > >> branch. One time consuming task is the check if a point,

[mkgmap-dev] Commit: r1946: Translate man_made=~".*pipe.*" as lines.

2011-05-15 Thread svn commit
Version 1946 was commited by marko on 2011-05-15 14:58:42 +0100 (Sun, 15 May 2011) Translate man_made=~".*pipe.*" as lines. ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Simplifying the check line in polygon

2011-05-15 Thread WanMil
Am 15.05.2011 15:10, schrieb Jon Burgess: > On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 14:31 +0200, WanMil wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am thinking about how to reduce the processing time of the locator >> branch. One time consuming task is the check if a point, a line or a >> polygon lies inbetween, cuts or lies outside

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Simplifying the check line in polygon

2011-05-15 Thread Jon Burgess
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 14:31 +0200, WanMil wrote: > Hi all, > > I am thinking about how to reduce the processing time of the locator > branch. One time consuming task is the check if a point, a line or a > polygon lies inbetween, cuts or lies outside another polygon. > > Processing time for this

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Simplifying the check line in polygon

2011-05-15 Thread navmaps
Hi Wanmil I don't propose spending too much time working on efficiency. First of all: a boundary is a boundary. All elements inside should exactly match the 'real world' boundary in order to avoid highways to be found in the next city. Second: there's still some quality problems in the locator

[mkgmap-dev] [locator] Simplifying the check line in polygon

2011-05-15 Thread WanMil
Hi all, I am thinking about how to reduce the processing time of the locator branch. One time consuming task is the check if a point, a line or a polygon lies inbetween, cuts or lies outside another polygon. Processing time for this check is directly related to the number of nodes that defin

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [locator] Country specific rules

2011-05-15 Thread WanMil
> Just wondering, maybe we can use the locator rules also for country or state > specific routing? > For instance in some countries (like Germany (?) according to the access > rules on osm, see > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Germany) > one is allow