[mkgmap-dev] Splitter ignores Relation-Relation ?

Hi, Maybe splitter contains an error. OSM data contains relations that are members of other relations, e.g. relation 349029 contains relation 339738 and is part of relation 349041. I don't see code in splitter that takes care about this fact, means, a relation is written to those tiles that

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with splitter

Hi Wolfgang. thanks for you input. See below.. Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:11:58 +0100 From: wolfgang.ham...@gmx.de To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with splitter Hi Gerd, your description of splitter's algorithm is in accordance to what I

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Splitter ignores Relation-Relation ?

Hi, Maybe splitter contains an error. OSM data contains relations that are members of other relations, e.g. relation 349029 contains relation 339738 and is part of relation 349041. I don't see code in splitter that takes care about this fact, means, a relation is written to those tiles

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Splitter ignores Relation-Relation ?

Am 16.03.2012 21:55, schrieb WanMil: Hi, Maybe splitter contains an error. OSM data contains relations that are members of other relations, e.g. relation 349029 contains relation 339738 and is part of relation 349041. I don't see code in splitter that takes care about this fact, means, a

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Splitter ignores Relation-Relation ?

Hi It would be a great thing and very usefull for route-relations. Large ones are mostly separated in many subrelations and the full name is just tagged to the collecting superrelation. So it would be great, to copy taggs via style-file from superrelation to their subrelations. But this isn't

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Small holes in boundary coverage

Hi WanMil, I saw these holes, but did not find a good reason besides the rounding problems. I look at it again tomorrow. Gerd WanMil wrote Hi, I have compiled world bounds using the performance branch. They can be downloaded from http://www.navmaps.eu/wanmil/bounds_perf_20120313.zip.