Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=track with no road_class and road_speed set breaks routing ## was ## "No roads near target" bug in Schwabmünchen

Hi Gerd, now I get both the warning during --list-styles and the Error during build. :-) when the offending line in the style is fixed, both the warning and the error disappear. :-) Looks good to me. Thanks a lot. Ciao, Franco Am 16.04.2013 07:01, schrieb Gerd Petermann: > Hi Franco, > > >

Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=track with no road_class and road_speed set breaks routing ## was ## "No roads near target" bug in Schwabmünchen

Hi Franco, > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=track with no road_class and road_speed set > breaks routing ## was ## "No roads near target" bug in Schwabmünchen > > franco_bez wrote > > > > franco_bez wrote > >> I tested your binary with the proposed change on the Style, and now I > >> still g

Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=track with no road_class and road_speed set breaks routing ## was ## "No roads near target" bug in Schwabmünchen

franco_bez wrote > > franco_bez wrote >> I tested your binary with the proposed change on the Style, and now I >> still get precisely 1 Error Message in my test case. Before there were >> plenty (maybe 100) of them. > The message confuses me its: >> SEVERE (MapBuilder): >> /home/franco/map_build/t

Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=track with no road_class and road_speed set breaks routing ## was ## "No roads near target" bug in Schwabmünchen

franco_bez wrote > I tested your binary with the proposed change on the Style, and now I > still get precisely 1 Error Message in my test case. Before there were > plenty (maybe 100) of them. The message confuses me its: > SEVERE (MapBuilder): /home/franco/map_build/test_cases/tiles/63360004.o5m:

Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=track with no road_class and road_speed set breaks routing ## was ## "No roads near target" bug in Schwabmünchen

Hi Franco, franco_bez wrote > What about a combination of 1) and 2) ? > If you pass 0 as the non-routable-type then drop the road, otherwise > replace the type ? In fact that was what I wanted to implement, but v3 contained a small error. Attached is v4 : routable_types_v4.patch

Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=track with no road_class and road_speed set breaks routing ## was ## "No roads near target" bug in Schwabmünchen

GerdP wrote > I've used Bernds style to reproduce the problem: > https://github.com/berndw1960/aiostyles > > Attached is a patch that replaces the "mkgmap:check_connected" feature > with > a "mkgmap:set_unconnected_type" feature. > routable_types_v3.patch >

Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=track with no road_class and road_speed set breaks routing ## was ## "No roads near target" bug in Schwabmünchen

GerdP wrote > Hi, > > the problem is caused by the "mkgmap:check_connected" feature. The current > implementation adds unconnected roads as lines, and is thus probably > producing problems instead of solving them. > One example is > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/18639983 > > I see thes

Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=track with no road_class and road_speed set breaks routing ## was ## "No roads near target" bug in Schwabmünchen

Am 15.04.2013 15:54, schrieb Josef Latt: > this style is missing cycleway=track ... > > Could someone contact Bernd. I'm here ;-) Thanks for this hint And you should have my mail-address Bernd signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature _

Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=track with no road_class and road_speed set breaks routing ## was ## "No roads near target" bug in Schwabmünchen

Am 15.04.2013 13:19, schrieb franco_bez: >> I've used Bernds style to reproduce the problem: >> https://github.com/berndw1960/aiostyles this style is missing cycleway=track ... Could someone contact Bernd. Thanks ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Support for "through_route" relations?

Sorry for late jumping into this discussion, but how do Garmin maps handle this? I've seen this issue on some local intersections, where the road is split and has different names. It is strange to see a turn left (or right) at the intersection when going straight but I never saw that (as far as

Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=track with no road_class and road_speed set breaks routing ## was ## "No roads near target" bug in Schwabmünchen

On 15.04.2013 12:19, GerdP wrote: > > > > > > Old version was: > highway=service | highway=estate | highway=living_street > { > add mkgmap:dead-end-check=false; > add mkgmap:check_connected = true > } > > the new rule should look simi

Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=track with no road_class and road_speed set breaks routing ## was ## "No roads near target" bug in Schwabmünchen

GerdP wrote > > franco_bez wrote >> Hi Gerd, >> I compiled another tgz archive to demonstrate the bug, in case you need >> it. >> >> http://francobez.bplaced.net/files/mkgmap/test_cases_errors.tgz >> >> Ciao, >> Franco > I've used Bernds style to reproduce the problem: > https://github.com/ber

Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=track with no road_class and road_speed set breaks routing ## was ## "No roads near target" bug in Schwabmünchen

franco_bez wrote > Hi Gerd, > I compiled another tgz archive to demonstrate the bug, in case you need > it. > > http://francobez.bplaced.net/files/mkgmap/test_cases_errors.tgz > > Ciao, > Franco I've used Bernds style to reproduce the problem: https://github.com/berndw1960/aiostyles Attached

Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=track with no road_class and road_speed set breaks routing ## was ## "No roads near target" bug in Schwabmünchen

Hi Minko, of course it depends on the style. I've used the basemap_style from here: git://github.com/berndw1960/aiostyles Gerd Minko-2 wrote > Why is that street not routable Gerd? > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/18639983 > > It is still reachable as pedestrian? > >> I think option

Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=track with no road_class and road_speed set breaks routing ## was ## "No roads near target" bug in Schwabmünchen

Why is that street not routable Gerd? http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/18639983 It is still reachable as pedestrian? > I think option 3 is what happens now. The road is not added to the > list of > roads, > it is treated like any other non-routable line (by mkgmap) and my > understanding

Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=track with no road_class and road_speed set breaks routing ## was ## "No roads near target" bug in Schwabmünchen

Felix Hartmann-2 wrote > 3) Take it out of the address index? I'm not sure if 2) is better or > not. In the above featured way, there is no error in OSM, hence I would > say better have the map looking correct, and one address not findable, > than have the map looking wrong. > The best solutio

Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=track with no road_class and road_speed set breaks routing ## was ## "No roads near target" bug in Schwabmünchen

On 15.04.2013 10:26, GerdP wrote: > Hi, > > the problem is caused by the "mkgmap:check_connected" feature. The current > implementation adds unconnected roads as lines, and is thus probably > producing problems instead of solving them. > One example is > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/186

Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=track with no road_class and road_speed set breaks routing ## was ## "No roads near target" bug in Schwabmünchen

Hi, the problem is caused by the "mkgmap:check_connected" feature. The current implementation adds unconnected roads as lines, and is thus probably producing problems instead of solving them. One example is http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/18639983 I see these solutuions: 1) ignore unconn