Am 23.12.2013 15:15, schrieb Gerd Petermann:
What do you mean with route restrictions ?
sorry, a route restriction is the internal name for it.
These route restriction are created for restriction relations
like http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Ah ok so you mean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marko,
for me it sounds like a bug in OSM, which should be fixed.
Henning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (MingW32)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSuUlfAAoJEPFgsWC7jOeTijoIAMrkT79PM51nJyrieyykpFNg
Am 24.12.2013 09:40, schrieb chris66:
Am 23.12.2013 15:15, schrieb Gerd Petermann:
What do you mean with route restrictions ?
sorry, a route restriction is the internal name for it.
These route restriction are created for restriction relations
like
Chris66 wrote
Am 23.12.2013 15:15, schrieb Gerd Petermann:
What do you mean with route restrictions ?
sorry, a route restriction is the internal name for it.
These route restriction are created for restriction relations
like http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Ah ok
If i use default as base style, i've a error.
Is a bug or my error?
# Base styles
include 'lines' from default;
finalize
# Compatibility include file
include 'inc/compat_lines' from default;
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 09:44:15AM +0100, Henning Scholland wrote:
for me it sounds like a bug in OSM, which should be fixed.
What is the bug in OSM data? That the ref=* should be attached to the
boundary=administrative instead of the place=town?
I guess I should try with precompiled
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marko,
if you find something like Xi:xii Kyttälä, FIN in a name-tag, then
this shoulod be wrong for a town. The name of the town would be
Kyttälä, or am I wrong?
Henning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (MingW32)
